Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions

appstoreApple is planning to alter its pricing formula for subscriptions in a major change that will benefit subscription-based apps and services like Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, and more, reports Financial Times. Apple is said to be considering changing the 30 percent fee that it currently charges and is discussing new commercial terms with media companies.

At the current point in time, all apps and in-app subscriptions work on a 30/70 split. Apple gets 30 percent of what's paid for an app or service, while the company or developer offering the app gets a 70 percent cut. That means when someone purchases Netflix through the Netflix iOS app, Apple gets over $2 of the fee paid. At the same time, Apple has disallowed direct links to outside subscription sign up services within apps, ensuring it gets its fee.

Apple's 30 percent subscription cut has been a sticking point for many companies, especially those with tight margins like music services, and it's gotten Apple into hot water in the past, most notably during the e-book price fixing case levied against it by the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the Financial Times, changing the App Store subscription terms could make Apple devices more appealing to content creators while also lessening potential pressure from regulators.

Changing the App Store's terms of trade could improve the economics of online content businesses and reassure regulators that the company is not abusing its position as gatekeeper to one of the world's most lucrative digital marketplaces.

On the Apple TV, Apple is already offering a more generous split, taking just 15 percent of revenue generated from subscription services like the recently released HBO Now.

There are no specifics on the terms that Apple is potentially considering for companies that offer subscription services, but it appears that the price cuts at this time will not extend to standalone apps.

Popular Stories

Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Updates App Store Guidelines With Stricter Rules for Low-Quality Apps

Tuesday June 9, 2026 3:52 pm PDT by
Apple updated its App Store Review Guidelines this week, adding stricter language around low-quality apps. The 4.3 Spam rule already barred overly simple apps in saturated categories, but Apple now includes language saying low-effort apps could be pulled from the App Store. Apps in oversaturated categories that are not updated, improved, or do not attract customers may be removed, according...
iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated

Apple Introduces Major App Store Subscription Overhaul at WWDC 2026

Thursday June 11, 2026 6:50 am PDT by
Apple announced a sweeping set of new subscription tools for App Store developers at WWDC 2026, including cross-developer subscription bundles, group and enterprise purchasing options, retention tools, and a streamlined submission workflow. Subscription Bundles and Suites The main change is a new Bundle and Suite system that lets developers partner with each other to offer combined...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Criticizes U.S. Antitrust Bill That Targets the App Store

Thursday June 11, 2026 2:49 pm PDT by
United States Senators Chuck Grassley and Amy Klobuchar this week reintroduced the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA) that targets major tech companies like Apple, and Apple is not happy to see it back. The bipartisan bill is reminiscent of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union, banning large platforms from favoring their own products or services, limiting competitors' ...

Top Rated Comments

AngerDanger Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
If you find yourself unsatisfied with any information obtained on MR, simply returned the unused portions for a full refund. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Crosscreek Avatar
145 months ago
Gwad, I hope Apple doesn't go broke doing this.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SgtPepper12 Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
145 months ago
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
A challenger appears!
So how about 0%, what they deserve for services that run completely independently from them?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
Yeah because developers don't use MacRumors...
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
furi0usbee Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
??? Why would this information need to be private?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)