AirPods Pro 3 Impossible to Repair, Earn Score of 0 in iFixit Teardown - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

AirPods Pro 3 Impossible to Repair, Earn Score of 0 in iFixit Teardown

iFixit today disassembled the AirPods Pro 3, giving us a look at what's inside and how the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ have changed in comparison to the AirPods Pro 2.


Apple designed the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ with a new foam-infused tip, and the design change is mainly visible under a microscope. You can see a small layer of foam at the top of the earbud where it meets the ear.

The AirPods have a 0.221 Wh battery cell inside, while the case has a single 1.334 Wh battery. The AirPods Pro 2 had two battery cells inside the case, and the change explains why we're down to 24 hours of battery life from the case instead of 30 hours like the AirPods Pro 2.

The case has fewer rare earth magnets inside, but they've been placed in different locations to ensure that MagSafe and Qi 2 charging still works as expected.

To get a look at other components inside the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌, iFixit essentially had to destroy them because Apple didn't design them to be repaired.

Since the first version of the AirPods launched, they've included a battery that is sealed shut with glue, and that hasn't changed with the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌. iFixit says battery replacements are so difficult that many repair shops won't even attempt to do it. The AirPods Pro Charging Case has the same glued-in battery.

airpods pro 3 ifixit
There's no way to attempt a battery repair without causing blemishes on the plastic of the earbuds and the casing, because they have to be pried open. Heat needs to be used to melt the adhesive, and there's no easy way to disconnect the flex cable that's inside each earbud.

With the need for specialized equipment and the inability to repair the earbuds and the case without causing damage, the ‌AirPods Pro 3‌ earned a 0 out of 10 repairability score from iFixit.

Related Roundup: AirPods Pro 3
Tag: iFixit
Buyer's Guide: AirPods Pro (Neutral)
Related Forum: AirPods

Popular Stories

Sony WF 1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3 Thumb 2

AirPods Pro 3 vs. Sony WF-1000XM6: Which Flagship Earbuds Should You Buy?

Tuesday April 21, 2026 9:44 am PDT by
Sony refreshed its earbuds earlier this year, introducing the $330 WF-1000XM6 earbuds to compete with the $249 AirPods Pro 3 that came out last September. We compared Sony's new earbuds with Apple's latest model to see which is better. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Sony's XM6 earbuds are smaller than the AirPods Pro 3 because there's no stem, but the in-ear fit...
airpods pro 3 glitter blue

What to Expect From the Next AirPods Pro, Launching as Soon as This Year

Wednesday April 22, 2026 2:34 pm PDT by
Apple is working on a new version of the AirPods Pro, which could come as soon as this year. The AirPods are expected to be a variant of the current AirPods Pro, which suggests they won't be called the AirPods Pro 4. Cameras Multiple sources have said Apple is developing AirPods Pro that have tiny infrared cameras. The cameras won't be used to take photos or videos like an iPhone camera,...
airpods pro 3 design

'AirPods Ultra' Rumored to Feature a Major Upgrade Over AirPods Pro

Thursday April 30, 2026 8:40 am PDT by
In a social media post this week, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reiterated that Apple is planning to release new AirPods with cameras "for Siri." Last month, Gurman said these AirPods will likely be priced above the current AirPods Pro 3, which Apple sells for $249. As a result, he said Apple is likely considering using "AirPods Ultra" branding for the camera-equipped AirPods. "AirPods Ultra"...

Top Rated Comments

Xade Avatar
8 months ago
What will Mother Nature say??? Ah, but that was another year's virtue signalling. Eco friendly is why you don't get a charger in your 2K iphone box, honest!
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago

So all AirPods basically become landfill unless they’re passed on/re-sold? Yikes.
Always been that way. I don't know that it's ever been realistic to replace the battery in any wireless earbuds
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjsuk Avatar
8 months ago

Has anyone ever guessed at the margin Apple has on these? I find it hard to imagine that they even cost Apple $20, but they charge over $200.
The calculations for this stuff always misses a number of key things to make it look like the company is ripping you off:
[LIST=1]
* Development cost.
* Supply chain and bring up costs.
* Post manufacturing distribution costs.
* The software engineering costs.
* The QA and testing costs.
* Long term maintenance and spares support.

I've seen products which had a $20 BOM and $100 on the above and the company was making $30.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ArtOfWarfare Avatar
8 months ago

So all AirPods basically become landfill unless they’re passed on/re-sold? Yikes.
I'm curious how many people actually throw electronics away. Don't they just end up in a junk drawer?
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jimjiminyjim Avatar
8 months ago
But to be fair, I put my AirPods Pro 2 and case through the washing machine at least five times, and they still work... so all that irreparable adhesive did actually have a very positive effect in my case. Most of my tech ends up in a junk drawer.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
This is the one thing that’s putting me off replacing my aging AirPod pro 1’s, and I wish Apple would face more scrutiny for this.

I just can’t justify spending £220 every 4 years or so on headphones, not only is it a colossal waste of money but so bad for the envirnoment

Waiting for AirPod max 2’s, since at least with them you can repair yourself
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)