Apple Subsidiary Fined Over $500,000 for Breaching Russian Sanctions - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Subsidiary Fined Over $500,000 for Breaching Russian Sanctions

Apple's Irish subsidiary has been fined £390,000 ($516,110) by the UK government for making payments to a sanctioned Russian streaming platform in 2022.

Apple Logo Cash Feature Mint
The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) said that Apple Distribution International Ltd. (ADI), the Republic of Ireland-based entity Apple uses to pay App Store developers, made two payments totaling £635,618 to Okko LLC, a Russian video streaming platform, in June and July 2022, at a time when Okko was subject to UK sanctions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The payments were routed through UK banks.

ADI voluntarily disclosed the payments to OFSI, and the agency confirmed that no breach had been attributed to Apple Inc. itself, only to the subsidiary. In a statement, Apple said:

We follow the laws in the countries where we operate and take sanctions compliance extremely seriously. After identifying two payments to a developer that days earlier had become affiliated with a sanctioned entity, we promptly and proactively reported our finding to the UK government. We are constantly working to enhance our already robust compliance protocols, which are consistent with industry standards.

OFSI said Apple had relied on corporate affiliates to handle payment processing, sanctions screening, and due diligence, but that companies are ultimately responsible for ensuring their own compliance with financial sanctions rules.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iCloud General Feature Redux

UK iCloud Users Could Claim £77 Each as Apple Case Heads to Trial

Tuesday June 23, 2026 1:49 am PDT by
A class action lawsuit accusing Apple of overcharging U.K. iCloud users has been certified to go ahead, putting the £3 billion ($3.9 billion) claim on track for a trial in October 2028. According to BBC News, the Competition Appeal Tribunal cleared consumer group Which? to bring the case on behalf of an estimated 40 million U.K. iPhone and iPad owners, each of whom could receive up to £77...
app store blue banner uk fixed

UK Pushes Apple to Loosen App Store Payment and NFC Rules

Tuesday June 30, 2026 3:00 am PDT by
The U.K.'s competition regulator has proposed letting app developers direct users to payment options outside Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store, in a move aimed at increasing competition and reducing the fees charged by the two companies. As reported by Reuters, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the proposals would remove restrictions that currently prevent U.K....
iphone 12 5g

Apple's $502M Optis Patent Case Heads to UK Supreme Court

Tuesday June 30, 2026 7:45 am PDT by
Apple will try to convince the UK Supreme Court this week to throw out a $502 million judgment in favor of patent holder Optis Wireless. As reported in the Financial Times, the UK Supreme Court this week takes up a dispute that has stretched on since 2019 in both U.S. and UK courts, when Optis first accused iPhones, iPads, and LTE-equipped Apple Watch models of infringing patents covering 4G ...

Top Rated Comments

16 weeks ago

This is a slap on the wrist for what they did. If banks are found to be in violation of this, they will be fined a lot more and, more importantly for them, punished substantially more in how they act.
I think you're missing the context of the Apple subsidiary's intent behind this. The Apple subsidiary made an accident and self-reported it. In turn it was hit with a 50% fine on the two transactions. In contrast, when Wall Street or big banks violate sanctions, it is often systemic, hidden, and done over the course of years. Even if slapped with billion-dollar fines, it pales in comparison to the profits they made moving that money. The initial commenter's point is that this amounted to an honest, self-reported mistake. The penalty appears to be rather large, especially compared to what willful bad actors get.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
The_Gream Avatar
16 weeks ago
🤷

Huh! So the Apple subsidiary, makes a payment to a recently sanctioned company, realize they messed up and reports themselves and the fine is like ~50% of the amount they sent.

I know there needs to be some sort of punishment for the mistake, but a 50% fine?

Wall Street and Big banks have done way more harm to the lives of people because of greed and they get a slap on the wrist.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Hajj.david Avatar
16 weeks ago

Good! NO excuse for this, sanctions are listed and available from, and provided by the government, it is on your onus to ensure you are compliant and the punishment for not being so are clearly laid out. Apple is not above this more the anyone else is not.
Yes lets blindly obey governments who want to starve out poor people. Shame on anyone who just wants to live normally right!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
roklanhavok Avatar
16 weeks ago
I think the fine is high for someone who accidentally did something (relatively minor) twice and then self reported. Everyone else here wants Apple to go out of business over it.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
16 weeks ago

Sanctions are evil and unjust and do nothing but make the average person suffer.
It is all about context.

Say a country decides to dump nuclear waste in the rivers, or invades it’s neighboring countries for more territory, etc., what options do other countries have to deal with this “bad actor”?

They can invade the bad actor? They can nuke/eliminate the bad actor? They can refuse to trade with the bad actor?

Of those options, sanctions is usually the least extreme.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AngstyKylo Avatar
16 weeks ago
If the fine wasn't hefty, companies would happily just take the hit.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)