Apple Subsidiary Fined Over $500,000 for Breaching Russian Sanctions - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Subsidiary Fined Over $500,000 for Breaching Russian Sanctions

Apple's Irish subsidiary has been fined £390,000 ($516,110) by the UK government for making payments to a sanctioned Russian streaming platform in 2022.

Apple Logo Cash Feature Mint
The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) said that Apple Distribution International Ltd. (ADI), the Republic of Ireland-based entity Apple uses to pay App Store developers, made two payments totaling £635,618 to Okko LLC, a Russian video streaming platform, in June and July 2022, at a time when Okko was subject to UK sanctions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The payments were routed through UK banks.

ADI voluntarily disclosed the payments to OFSI, and the agency confirmed that no breach had been attributed to Apple Inc. itself, only to the subsidiary. In a statement, Apple said:

We follow the laws in the countries where we operate and take sanctions compliance extremely seriously. After identifying two payments to a developer that days earlier had become affiliated with a sanctioned entity, we promptly and proactively reported our finding to the UK government. We are constantly working to enhance our already robust compliance protocols, which are consistent with industry standards.

OFSI said Apple had relied on corporate affiliates to handle payment processing, sanctions screening, and due diligence, but that companies are ultimately responsible for ensuring their own compliance with financial sanctions rules.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

generic tracking prompt orange

Apple Hit With $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over App Tracking Rules

Thursday September 3, 2026 7:46 am PDT by
Apple is facing a £2 billion ($2.7 billion) lawsuit in London accusing it of imposing stricter App Tracking Transparency rules on third party developers than on its own advertising services (via Reuters). The case, filed at London's Competition Appeal Tribunal, follows a similar suit in which the tribunal ordered Apple to pay around £1.5 billion over App Store commissions last October, a...
iOS 27 Next to iPhone

Here's When iOS 27 Rolls Out Today in Every Time Zone [Update: It's Out]

Sunday September 13, 2026 3:00 am PDT by
Update 10:04 a.m.: iOS 27 is rolling out now, though it may take a bit for all users to see it, so keep checking! Apple is about to release iOS 27, which will finally deliver more advanced Siri AI capabilities as well as a variety of other refinements, improvements, and new features to iPhones. It's Apple's biggest software update of the year, and Apple announced at Wednesday's iPhone event...
iOS 27 Icon iPhone

iOS 27 Available Now With These 8 New Features

Monday September 14, 2026 9:00 am PDT by
Update — 10 a.m. Pacific Time: Apple has released iOS 27. During its iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone Duo event last week, Apple announced that iOS 27 will be released widely on Monday, September 14. iOS 27 should be available around 10 a.m. Pacific Time / 1 p.m. Eastern Time today via the Settings app, under General → Software Update. Below, we have highlighted eight new features and...

Top Rated Comments

24 weeks ago

This is a slap on the wrist for what they did. If banks are found to be in violation of this, they will be fined a lot more and, more importantly for them, punished substantially more in how they act.
I think you're missing the context of the Apple subsidiary's intent behind this. The Apple subsidiary made an accident and self-reported it. In turn it was hit with a 50% fine on the two transactions. In contrast, when Wall Street or big banks violate sanctions, it is often systemic, hidden, and done over the course of years. Even if slapped with billion-dollar fines, it pales in comparison to the profits they made moving that money. The initial commenter's point is that this amounted to an honest, self-reported mistake. The penalty appears to be rather large, especially compared to what willful bad actors get.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
The_Gream Avatar
24 weeks ago
🤷

Huh! So the Apple subsidiary, makes a payment to a recently sanctioned company, realize they messed up and reports themselves and the fine is like ~50% of the amount they sent.

I know there needs to be some sort of punishment for the mistake, but a 50% fine?

Wall Street and Big banks have done way more harm to the lives of people because of greed and they get a slap on the wrist.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Hajj.david Avatar
24 weeks ago

Good! NO excuse for this, sanctions are listed and available from, and provided by the government, it is on your onus to ensure you are compliant and the punishment for not being so are clearly laid out. Apple is not above this more the anyone else is not.
Yes lets blindly obey governments who want to starve out poor people. Shame on anyone who just wants to live normally right!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
roklanhavok Avatar
24 weeks ago
I think the fine is high for someone who accidentally did something (relatively minor) twice and then self reported. Everyone else here wants Apple to go out of business over it.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
24 weeks ago

Sanctions are evil and unjust and do nothing but make the average person suffer.
It is all about context.

Say a country decides to dump nuclear waste in the rivers, or invades it’s neighboring countries for more territory, etc., what options do other countries have to deal with this “bad actor”?

They can invade the bad actor? They can nuke/eliminate the bad actor? They can refuse to trade with the bad actor?

Of those options, sanctions is usually the least extreme.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AngstyKylo Avatar
24 weeks ago
If the fine wasn't hefty, companies would happily just take the hit.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)