Lawsuit Accusing Apple of Recording of Confidential Siri Requests Without User Consent Dismissed - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Lawsuit Accusing Apple of Recording of Confidential Siri Requests Without User Consent Dismissed

A Northern California judge today dismissed a class action lawsuit that accused Apple of the "unlawful and intentional" recording of confidential Siri communications without user consent.

hey siri
The class action lawsuit was first filed in August 2019 after it became known that Apple had employed contractors to listen to and grade some anonymized ‌Siri‌ conversations for product improvement purposes.

Those contractors told The Guardian that they overheard confidential medical details, drug deals, and other private information from accidental ‌Siri‌ activations, and some expressed concern that users were not adequately informed about the recordings.

As noted by Bloomberg, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White said that the plaintiffs in the class action case did not provide enough detail about the alleged recordings that Apple collected. The plaintiffs are required to prove that they have suffered injury from Apple's actions in a "concrete and particularized" way that's not "conjectural or hypothetical."

All of the allegations in the lawsuit were based on information that was included in the original story from The Guardian highlighting Apple's use of contractors to analyze ‌Siri‌ data, with the plaintiffs providing no proof that their own private data was accidentally collected by Apple and misused.

The Guardian article does not plausibly suggest that all Apple's devices were subject to accidental triggers and review by third party contractors, much less that such interception always occurred in reasonably private settings. The article discusses frequency of accidental triggers primarily in relation to the Apple Watch and the HomePod speakers, neither of which are owned by the Plaintiffs.

Moreover, the article expressly states that only a "small portion" of daily Siri activations including were sent to contractors and that they included both deliberate and accidental activations. Finally, although the article describes private communications among the recordings sent to contractors, Plaintiffs allege no facts to suggest that their own private communications were intercepted by accidental triggers.

Though Apple's motion to dismiss the lawsuit was granted, the judge in the case is allowing the consumers involved in the lawsuit to revise and refile within 20 days, so Apple is not in the clear as of yet.

Following the class action lawsuit and other negative public feedback, Apple temporarily suspended and overhauled its ‌Siri‌ evaluation program, and in iOS 13.2, added an option to let users delete ‌Siri‌ history and opt out of sharing audio recordings.

Popular Stories

iOS 27 Ft

iOS 27: New Siri Features Could Be Gated Behind a Waitlist

Friday June 5, 2026 4:24 am PDT by
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has published his WWDC preview ahead of Monday's keynote, and while almost all of the iOS 27 features he covers have already made the rounds, there are a couple of details worth highlighting. As we've covered previously, Apple is turning Siri into a full chatbot that users can interact with, similar to Claude or ChatGPT. The Siri chatbot will be integrated into...
WWDC26 MR Live Coverage Article

WWDC 2026 Apple Event Live Keynote Coverage: iOS 27, Revamped Siri, and More

Monday June 8, 2026 9:15 am PDT by
Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) starts today with the traditional keynote kicking things off at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. MacRumors is on hand for the event and we'll be sharing details and our thoughts throughout the day. We're expecting to see a number of software-related announcements today, headlined by a reset on Apple's push into AI that should see a significant overhaul...
Siri AI

Apple Announces 'Siri AI' at WWDC 2026

Monday June 8, 2026 10:52 am PDT by
Apple today announced a significantly revamped Siri at WWDC 2026, rebranding it as "Siri AI" and unveiling out a wave of new capabilities spanning conversational depth, system-wide integration, and a redesigned interface across platforms. Apple framed the update with the acknowledgment that "there are times when you expect more from Siri." The company is describing the redesigned assistant...

Top Rated Comments

70 months ago

I hope they fix the lawsuit and get this going.
Why? Because they are a trillion dollar company who should hand over their $’s to Lawyers and Fools?

* Apple. Using anonymous voices to check for accuracy, versus
* 'Other' companies: Use your actual conversations, attached to your data for targeted advertising who tell you they are using your recordings for accuracy (of advertising).
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
russell_314 Avatar
70 months ago

Apple can never do wrong according to the macrumors forums.
I’m not sure if you know but the forms are mostly people who like Apple and Apple products. I guess you could hang around here if you hate Apple and hate their products but that just seems like a waste of your time but hey it’s your time 🤷‍♂️
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
70 months ago
Apple faces criticism on privacy where warranted and makes changes when necessary. Because of their privacy rules, no individual was harmed. Good Decision.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Realityck Avatar
70 months ago
I am glad this went nowhere.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
LeadingHeat Avatar
70 months ago
You know how when you hit the “I agree” button when it asks if you want to improve Siri? That’s when your anonymous recordings get sent in, for analysis. Why is this an issue? Of course someone’s going to listen if you allow that. [I] [/I]
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
xander49x Avatar
70 months ago
when you set up your device you chose to let apple use analyses or not to use. if you have a problem then stop using apple products, for one I will keep using apple as they are the most secure products on the market.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)