Court Allows Google-Apple Search Deal to Continue With Conditions - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Court Allows Google-Apple Search Deal to Continue With Conditions

Google will not be barred from entering into search agreements with companies like Apple, the judge presiding over the antitrust case between Google and the U.S. Department of Justice said today (via Bloomberg).

Google Logo Feature Slack
Google is not allowed to enter into exclusive contracts for search engine distribution, but it is still allowed to pay to Apple to be a search engine option on iPhone. Apple earns around $20 billion annually from Google, and there was a risk that the two companies could be banned from entering into search engine agreements.

"Cutting off payments from Google almost certainly will impose substantial -- in some cases, crippling -- downstream harms to distribution partners, related markets, and consumers, which counsels against a broad payment ban," said the judge.

Google is specifically allowed to make payments and offer "other consideration" to distribution partners for the preloading or placement of Google Search, Chrome, and Gemini.

Google will not have to sell its Chrome browser, or the Android operating system. The judge said that the government "overreached in seeking the forced divestiture" of the assets.

Besides being barred from entering into exclusive search engine distribution contracts, Google will also need to share data with rival search engines. The DOJ had asked that Google be forced to provide data on how it decides what to surface based on a given search.

Google was found to have a search monopoly back in August of 2024, and the court has been deciding what action to take to break up Google's monopoly since then. The DOJ was pushing for the divestiture of Chrome and the possible divestiture of Android.

Google is appealing the ruling, likely due to the data sharing component.

Tag: Google

Top Rated Comments

8 months ago
Good. We can already change our default search engine if we want. Apple isn’t forcing us to use Google.

Attachment Image
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gleepskip Avatar
8 months ago
The cashier's check finally cleared the judge's bank account.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
What about Firefox? I think Mozilla needs that Google search engine money more than Apple. It's not a good situation, but Google's money is probably very helpful for Firefox. I'm more worried about the Chromium monopoly than the Google search monopoly.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
Surely unrelated: Gemini incoming as an option as soon as possible, probably.

edit: if you want a good search engine and have an adult job and are willing to use a very small amount of that money to improve your web search experience, try Kagi.

It's like Google was in 2003 with some additional useful features and no bloat or bs.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
I can’t imagine how or why the deal still exists. Seems really dumb on Googles part. They have the best search engine by a mile. If they stopped paying tomorrow, what’s Apple going to do? They’re not going to update all their customers’ default search engine to something worse.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jz0309 Avatar
8 months ago

Besides being barred from entering into exclusive search engine distribution contracts, Google will also need to share data with rival search engines. The DOJ had asked that Google be forced to provide data on how it decides what to surface based on a given search.
what does that actually mean? sharing data? what data? and how is that enforced/monitored?
DOJ request was at least somewhat clearer ...

Supposedly Google will appeal the monopoly ruling.
Keep the popcorn supply steady!
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)