Spotify Premium Users Get Lossless Streaming After Years of Delays - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Spotify Premium Users Get Lossless Streaming After Years of Delays

Spotify has officially rolled out lossless audio streaming to Premium subscribers after years of delays. The feature, which was first promised in 2021, is gradually becoming available in 50 markets including the US, UK, Australia, and Germany.

Enabling Lossless from Your Profile
Thankfully, Spotify includes lossless streaming at no additional cost for existing Premium members. That's particularly good news, since early rumors suggested Spotify would offer lossless as a higher-priced tier. Not so.

This probably has something to do with the fact that in the intervening years Apple decided to include lossless audio as part of its regular Apple Music subscription at no additional cost. Shortly after, Amazon Music, which previously charged extra for its HD tier, matched the move.

Spotify Premium users will receive in-app notifications when the feature becomes available and can enable it through the media quality settings. A lossless indicator also appears in the Now Playing bar when streaming high-quality audio. Spotify says nearly every song on the streaming service will be available in lossless, with a clearly labelled 'Lossless' symbol.

The service supports 24-bit/44.1 kHz FLAC files, though this falls short of Apple Music, Tidal, and Qobuz, which offer up to 24-bit/192 kHz. The lossless quality being played also appears in the Connect Picker for compatible hardware, which includes devices from Sony, Bose, Samsung, and Sennheiser at launch, with Sonos and Amazon integration expected next month.

Spotify says the lossless rollout will continue over the next two months across all supported regions. First reports that Spotify was working on a lossless audio version of its streaming service appeared almost eight years ago, when the company started testing the option with a small group of users.

Tag: Spotify

Top Rated Comments

wanha Avatar
7 months ago
not gonna lie, I think they might have rushed it
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago

Not going to get Spotify premium and not going to given money to streaming - prefer to buy my own music with cds, LPs etc and urge people to do the same.
I’ll stick with Apple Music, CDs are a thing in the past. My car doesn’t doesn’t even have a CD player. Digital convenience will always win in my book
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SilmarilFinder Avatar
7 months ago
Although they’re very late to the party, I still don’t see the point of this, especially if you’re listening on AirPods, car speakers (yes even from the high end B&O speakers) or the built in speakers on your phone, iPad or laptop.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
techyOS Avatar
7 months ago

Needs Atmos, this is a decade old half-measure.

Even for Stereo, Atmos offers higher headroom and less distortion and often, for the past few years or so, better mixes.

That first gen back in 2020 was very bad because they automated conversions but since then new releases have been pretty stellar across the board. Nearly all of my new music listening is in Atmos whether I'm in the car or using something that supports it / "Spatial Audio", using fixed position, obviously.

Glad it's not an additional cost, but unfortunate for Atmos producers and the millions of consumers who have devices capable of decoding it.
Atmos obviously has the potential to be amazing as we’ve seen in movies and TV shows, but I feel like for music it isn’t fully there yet. Most music production first happens in stereo since that’s how the song is mostly being played (stereo systems, headphones, car speakers). Then, producers try to take that track and mix it in Atmos for services like Apple Music. However, music is much harder to mix in Atmos versus movies because there are so many elements playing at the same time, whereas that isn’t the case in movies (mostly dialogue or singular sound effects). Additionally, since the population that’s listening to Atmos tracks is relatively low, Atmos production isn’t a huge focus point, especially for artists with a lower budget. The result is an Atmos track that’s technically great, but isn’t perfectly mixed (Example: Betty by AJR, released July 2025, piano part at 2 minutes is too quiet, immediately goes back into loud chorus).

sorry for the yap
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 months ago
Not going to get Spotify premium and not going to given money to streaming - prefer to buy my own music with cds, LPs etc and urge people to do the same.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
turbineseaplane Avatar
7 months ago

So glad I left Spotify after they funded Rogan to the tune of $300M+ an all he stands for and has platformed.
Umm ... You've been following Tim Cooks behaviors lately, right?

(I agree with you about the Spotify Rogan part ... but there is nobody who is clean here)
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)