Apple's Return to Intel Rumored to Extend to iPhone - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple's Return to Intel Rumored to Extend to iPhone

Intel is expected to begin supplying some Mac and iPad chips in a few years, and the latest rumor claims the partnership might extend to the iPhone.

Intel Inside iPhone Feature
In a research note with investment firm GF Securities this week, obtained by MacRumors, analyst Jeff Pu said he and his colleagues "now expect" Intel to reach a supply deal with Apple for at least some non-pro iPhone chips starting in 2028.

The non-pro iPhone chips would be manufactured with Intel's future 14A process, according to Pu.

The research note did not provide any other details about these potential plans, but based on the stated timeframe, Intel could start supplying Apple with the A22 chip for devices like the "iPhone 20" and "iPhone 20e" in around three years from now.

Importantly, there is no indication that Intel would play a role in designing the iPhone chips, with its involvement expected to be strictly limited to fabrication. Apple would continue to design iPhone chips, and Intel would start to handle a smaller percentage of manufacturing alongside Apple's primary chipmaker TSMC.

Last month, Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said he expects Intel to begin shipping Apple's lowest-end M-series chip for select Mac and iPad models as early as mid-2027. For this, Kuo said Apple plans to utilize Intel's 18A process, which is the "earliest available sub-2nm advanced node manufactured in North America."

Intel supplying Apple-designed, Arm-based chips would differ from the era of Intel-based Macs, which used Intel-designed processors with x86 architecture.

Apple reaching a chip supply deal with Intel would boost its reliance on an American manufacturing company and help to diversify its supply chain.

Intel previously supplied Apple with cellular modems for some iPhone 7 to iPhone 11 models.

Tags: Intel, Jeff Pu

Popular Stories

rosetta 2

macOS 27 Golden Gate Is the Last to Support Intel Apps via Rosetta 2

Wednesday June 10, 2026 5:39 am PDT by
macOS 27 Golden Gate is the final version of macOS to feature full Rosetta 2 support, meaning the translation layer that keeps Intel-built apps running on Apple silicon Macs is set to disappear entirely with next year's major macOS release. Golden Gate is the first macOS release limited to Apple silicon Macs and marks the end of the road for Intel-based hardware, but the implications reach...
Intel Inside iPhone Feature

Apple to Make Chips in US With Intel, Trump Says

Thursday June 18, 2026 2:57 am PDT by
Apple has agreed to work with Intel to manufacture some of its chips in the United States, U.S. president Trump said on Thursday. Intel's stock rose 9 percent in premarket trading following Trump's comments, which appeared in a social media post. Apple was up 0.6 percent in premarket trading. Neither Apple nor Intel have officially commented on the deal, but The Wall Street Journal reporte...
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

iPhone Users Who Pay for iCloud Storage Get Two New Perks on iOS 27

Thursday July 2, 2026 6:10 am PDT by
If you pay for certain iCloud+ storage plans beyond the 5GB that Apple offers for free, you will receive two more perks on iOS 27 at no additional cost. A summary of the two new iCloud+ perks on iOS 27:Increased daily usage limits for some new Apple Intelligence features, including image generation in the revamped Image Playground app. HomeKit Secure Video cameras receive generated video...

Top Rated Comments

Apple Knowledge Navigator Avatar
8 months ago
This truly has been the week of April Fools news.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
Small Rant: Every time one of these stories drops, headlines like “Apple’s Return to Intel” make me wince a little. Sure, the article eventually clarifies that Intel isn’t designing anything here, but the headline alone frames it as some dramatic reversal, like Apple suddenly bailed on Apple Silicon and went crawling back.

For people who actually follow this stuff, we know better. We read past the headline, we care about the architecture, the supply chain, the roadmap, all of it. But for everyone else, it sends the wrong signal.

When Apple used Intel chips before, they were genuinely dependent on Intel’s roadmap, stuck moving only as fast as Intel could innovate. That’s not remotely what’s happening now. This time, Intel is simply one of several manufacturers building Apple’s chips. Apple still owns the design, the direction, and the pace. The headline just doesn’t reflect that reality.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
8 months ago
I don't care who fabs the chips. If they pass Apple's quality controls, then they are good enough for me. 👍🏻
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Black Magic Avatar
8 months ago

Small Rant: Every time one of these stories drops, headlines like “Apple’s Return to Intel” make me wince a little. Sure, the article eventually clarifies that Intel isn’t designing anything here, but the headline alone frames it as some dramatic reversal, like Apple suddenly bailed on Apple Silicon and went crawling back.

For people who actually follow this stuff, we know better. We read past the headline, we care about the architecture, the supply chain, the roadmap, all of it. But for everyone else, it sends the wrong signal.

When Apple used Intel chips before, they were genuinely dependent on Intel’s roadmap, stuck moving only as fast as Intel could innovate. That’s not remotely what’s happening now. This time, Intel is simply one of several manufacturers building Apple’s chips. Apple still owns the design, the direction, and the pace. The headline just doesn’t reflect that reality.
So are you suggesting that Macrumors is using sensational headlines for clickbait?
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
veggiespam Avatar
8 months ago
Elsewhere online, people say the "A" means "Angstrom". So, we finally are ditching the nanometer "nm" for a much cooler abbreviation: "Å". Now, can we please start using the proper symbol.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago

When are they gonna get that cancer called Tim Cook out of that company!

Intel is the main reason they started making their own chips.

Why would you go back to the same worthless trash company that can’t adhere to thermal thresholds causing overheating repeatedly

That’s one of those companies that just should’ve been left to die

It’s been a good run Apple if this is what you end up doing because many of us are probably not gonna stick with your brand
Thanks for telling us you didn’t read the article.
This might shock you a little bit… But apple doesn’t actually *produce* the chips they use, just like they don’t produce the displays, cameras, etc they use.
They designed them, which is very different from producing them.
Apple is not returning to Intel *designed* chips.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)