Apple Faces Lawsuit Over Continuity Camera Patent and Antitrust Claims - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Faces Lawsuit Over Continuity Camera Patent and Antitrust Claims

by

Apple this week got sued in a New Jersey Federal court by the maker of mobile video app Camo, alleging Apple stole its technology when the company integrated its Continuity Camera feature into iOS 16 in 2022.

continuity camera
Released by London-based Reincubate in 2020, the Camo app enables iPhone and Android smartphones to be used as webcams for desktop-based video calls.

Apple's Continuity Camera serves a similar function within its own ecosystem, allowing an iPhone to be used as a wireless webcam with a nearby Mac that is signed into the same Apple Account.

Reincubate said the tech giant copied patented features from its Camo app and incorporated them into its mobile operating system in order to "redirect user demand to Apple's own platform-tied offering."

According to the lawsuit, Apple "actively induced and encouraged" Reincubate to develop and market Camo for iOS, then later copied its functionality and built it into iOS as Continuity Camera.

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

Reincubate called Apple's conduct an example of "Sherlocking," which refers to Apple building an app or system feature that duplicates functionality previously offered by a third-party app.

"Rather than competing with us, Apple deployed a series of obstacles to tilt the playing field, infringed our IP, and did so in service of preventing competition from rival platforms," Reincubate CEO Aidan Fitzpatrick said in a statement given to Reuters.

"Apple competes fairly while respecting the intellectual property rights of others, and these camera features were developed internally by Apple engineers," Apple responded in a statement.

Aside from accusing Apple of infringing its patents, Reincubate's suit was filed as an antitrust claim, alleging that Apple violates U.S. law by locking users into its ecosystem and preventing them from switching to competitors. Reincubate has requested unspecified monetary damages and court orders that would block Apple's alleged misconduct.

Tags: Apple Antitrust, Continuity, Apple Lawsuits

Popular Stories

Jon Prosser Rainbow

Apple Agrees to Let Jon Prosser Formally Contest iOS 26 Leak Lawsuit

Thursday June 11, 2026 7:57 am PDT by
Apple and leaker Jon Prosser have jointly asked a federal court to set aside the default judgment entered against him last October, with Prosser agreeing to hand over documents he had thus far failed to fully produce. Apple filed suit against Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti in July 2025, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets after Prosser published videos showing recreated renderings of ...
Read Full Article • 46 comments
iCloud General Feature Redux

UK iCloud Users Could Claim £77 Each as Apple Case Heads to Trial

Tuesday June 23, 2026 1:49 am PDT by
A class action lawsuit accusing Apple of overcharging U.K. iCloud users has been certified to go ahead, putting the £3 billion ($3.9 billion) claim on track for a trial in October 2028. According to BBC News, the Competition Appeal Tribunal cleared consumer group Which? to bring the case on behalf of an estimated 40 million U.K. iPhone and iPad owners, each of whom could receive up to £77...
Read Full Article • 82 comments
app store blue banner epic 1

Supreme Court Will Hear Apple's Appeal in Epic Games App Store Fight

Tuesday June 30, 2026 10:34 am PDT by
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear Apple's appeal against the contempt ruling that forced it to change its App Store linking rules, reports Reuters. In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said the court's decision was welcome news. This is an important question of law and we are pleased the Supreme Court will hear our case. Apple asked the Supreme Court to review the decision...
Read Full Article • 28 comments

Top Rated Comments

topgunn Avatar
topgunn
22 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
Which is exactly what you would say if you were bringing a suit against one of the largest tech giants in the world. It doesn't mean it's true.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
N
neuropsychguy
22 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
While their version of events might be true, it’s also possible that it is not true and this lawsuit is completely without merit. Why are the people in the company that instigated that lawsuit automatically more trustworthy than Apple? Do you know them personally and know the history of what really happened?

I think the wisest approach is to withhold judgment until the case is done.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jonnysods Avatar
jonnysods
22 weeks ago
"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
C
ChrisMac47
22 weeks ago

So the maker of the hardware and software for all the products, has to find a no name mom and pops to make its camera work with its own devices? I mean it doesn’t even sound right.
Apple uses a lot of third-party SW to drive its hardware (I worked for a company supplying them and other phone integrators). They usually operate by initially licensing it, but after a couple of years stop paying the license fees, claiming they are using their own SW. That's either a blatant lie, or their own SW is just a crude copy. In this case, they apparently did not even bother licensing.

This is the DNA of Apple. They are so big and wealthy, they use their size to bully small companies. The other large tech companies do the same in their determination to get their own way.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zarmanto Avatar
zarmanto
22 weeks ago

Can you patent ideas?
As Apple learned, many, many years ago ('https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/partiful-calls-apple-a-copycat-for-new-invites-app.2448774/post-33716922'), the answer to that tends to vary from one idea to the next.

Some life lessons that we all need to learn to appreciate:

* The big guy isn't always the bad guy... but sometimes, they are.
* The little guy isn't always crying wolf... but sometimes, they are.
* Ideas aren't always patentable... but sometimes, they are.
* The situation is almost never as clean and straightforward as armchair litigators wish to believe.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
macdisciple Avatar
macdisciple
22 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
I mean, maybe, but "victims" will use the most inflammatory language possible in order to win the highest award possible.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments