YouTuber Jon Prosser Responds to Apple's Lawsuit Over iOS 26 Leaks - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

YouTuber Jon Prosser Responds to Apple's Lawsuit Over iOS 26 Leaks

Jon Prosser today responded to Apple's lawsuit over iOS 26 leaks, with the YouTuber placing much of the blame on his acquaintance Michael Ramacciotti.

Jon Prosser Rainbow
As a refresher, Apple sued Prosser and Ramacciotti in July 2025 over alleged theft of the company's trade secrets. Apple alleged that the duo coordinated to break into former Apple software engineer Ethan Lipnik's development iPhone, in order to access and profit off details about "iOS 19," which ended up being called iOS 26.

Last year, Prosser leaked several details about "iOS 19" in videos shared on his YouTube channel Front Page Tech, several months before Apple announced the update at WWDC 2025. Later, an anonymous tipster informed Apple that the information was allegedly sourced from Lipnik's iPhone, which prompted the company to investigate.

Apple ultimately fired Lipnik and sued Prosser and Ramacciotti.

In a court document obtained by MacRumors, Prosser admitted to and denied many of Apple's claims, with some of the key ones summarized below:

  • Prosser denied that he planned or participated in any conspiracy or coordinated scheme with Ramacciotti for the purpose of injuring Apple.
  • Prosser admitted that he participated in a FaceTime video call with Ramacciotti, wherein Prosser was shown certain "iOS 19" features and apps running on the development iPhone.
  • Prosser denied that any of the information he viewed contained trade secrets.
  • Prosser denied knowing that the development iPhone belonged to Lipnik.
  • Prosser denied that he is in possession of any further confidential Apple information.

Prosser placed much of the blame on Ramacciotti. In the response, Prosser's attorney said that Ramacciotti's act of displaying the iOS 19 features on the FaceTime call was not induced by Prosser and, as such, Ramacciotti is "completely responsible" for the disclosure of Apple's alleged trade secrets, if any.

Prosser's attorney said Ramacciotti is responsible for all harm caused to Prosser.

Unfortunately, the attorney made several typos throughout the document, including writing that Prosser has "not knowledge" if iOS 19 was "unreleased."

Another typo made was "Prosser Michael Ramacciotti" in the paragraph below:

Prosser denies that he planned or participated in any conspiracy or coordinated scheme with Prosser Michael Ramacciotti ("Ramacciotti") for the purpose of injuring Apple. Any payments by Prosser were after the fact of the alleged theft by the former Apple employee, Michael Ramacciotti.

The case is before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Prosser has requested a jury trial on all issues so triable by a jury.

Related Roundups: iOS 26, iPadOS 26
Related Forum: iOS 26

Popular Stories

Jon Prosser Rainbow

Apple Agrees to Let Jon Prosser Formally Contest iOS 26 Leak Lawsuit

Thursday June 11, 2026 7:57 am PDT by
Apple and leaker Jon Prosser have jointly asked a federal court to set aside the default judgment entered against him last October, with Prosser agreeing to hand over documents he had thus far failed to fully produce. Apple filed suit against Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti in July 2025, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets after Prosser published videos showing recreated renderings of ...
iCloud General Feature Redux

UK iCloud Users Could Claim £77 Each as Apple Case Heads to Trial

Tuesday June 23, 2026 1:49 am PDT by
A class action lawsuit accusing Apple of overcharging U.K. iCloud users has been certified to go ahead, putting the £3 billion ($3.9 billion) claim on track for a trial in October 2028. According to BBC News, the Competition Appeal Tribunal cleared consumer group Which? to bring the case on behalf of an estimated 40 million U.K. iPhone and iPad owners, each of whom could receive up to £77...
app store blue banner epic 1

Supreme Court Will Hear Apple's Appeal in Epic Games App Store Fight

Tuesday June 30, 2026 10:34 am PDT by
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear Apple's appeal against the contempt ruling that forced it to change its App Store linking rules, reports Reuters. In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said the court's decision was welcome news. This is an important question of law and we are pleased the Supreme Court will hear our case. Apple asked the Supreme Court to review the decision...

Top Rated Comments

NewYorkRanger Avatar
1 day ago at 07:42 pm
Jon Prosser - A talentless leech who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and is now throwing his friends under the bus by saying they grabbed his hand and put his hand in the jar. Sure...complete scumbag behaviour.

A textbook case of "F Around & Find Out". Get 'em Apple.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
1 day ago at 07:12 pm
May be off topic but this one gives me the ICK. Why is he superimposing himself INTO Tim Cook’s place in front of that Rainbow arch? He’s not even part of apple, he’s the racoon who raids them for company secrets! And it always pissed me off that he held that iPad mini and waved it around but he never looked at it or read from it. It was just there for set dressing. Triggered me.

I am autistic, this may be why these little things bother me so much.


Attachment Image
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
1 day ago at 06:48 pm
He’s going to lose this case anyway. It took him a long time to respond to this lawsuit.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jz0309 Avatar
1 day ago at 06:55 pm
Well, if he's "innocent" as he describes - why did it take a year (it seems that long) to say so? This just doesn't add up ... but whatever
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
conmee Avatar
1 day ago at 06:49 pm
This man is a hero and the Julian Assange of iPhone leaks.

P.S. Should I add “/s” or is it obvious?
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
conmee Avatar
1 day ago at 06:56 pm
If Ramacciotti was just an acquaintance, why just randomly show Prosser the dev phone? I think I feel bad for Ethan given his poor choice in friends and the fact he seems to be the only one “injured” in this entire charade.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)