Audit Claims Apple Received Favorable Treatment in Grand Central Terminal Lease Talks - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Audit Claims Apple Received Favorable Treatment in Grand Central Terminal Lease Talks

by

Last December, Apple opened a massive new retail store in Manhattan's historic Grand Central Terminal, adding a high-profile presence to the busy commuting, tourist, and shopping hub. Apple's lease agreement with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) was quickly questioned by government officials, who were concerned that Apple had received favorable treatment during the negotiations and was paying significant lower rent than would otherwise have been expected for the location.

The MTA countered those claims with its own statements outlining how Apple is paying four times as much rent as the restaurant it replaced while also paying $5 million to the restaurant to vacate its lease and investing in building upgrades for the new store. The agency also argued that Apple's presence would indirectly boost terminal revenue through increased traffic at other merchants that, unlike Apple, pay a portion of their revenue to the terminal.

apple store grand central front view
But the New York Post now reports that a state audit of those lease negotiations has determined that Apple did indeed receive an "unfair" edge in what was supposed to be an open competition for the space.

A fresh audit by state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli says the MTA last May allowed the California-based tech giant to set a daunting hurdle for rival bidders to clear in a tight, 30-day window — namely, that they be willing to front $5 million in cash.

“The competitive process followed by MTA . . . was at a minimum severely slanted toward Apple,” reads the report, submitted to MTA officials Friday and expected to be made public today.

The state comptroller's office has announced the release of the audit report, revealing that Apple and the MTA had been in negotiations for the space for over two years and that Apple had already made payments to the vacating restaurant before the space was publicly opened for proposals.

"While Apple may turn out to be a good tenant, the MTA set a troubling precedent when it played favorites and gave Apple a competitive edge over others for the Grand Central space," DiNapoli said. "Apple was directly involved in setting the terms of the lease and given exclusive access to information more than a year before any other vendor knew the Grand Central location was available. The company even signed a $2 million agreement with the current tenant to vacate its space five days before the MTA issued the RFP.

In response to the audit, the state is proposing increased oversight on competitive public authority contracts, a move which give the comptroller's office more authority to examine such agreements before they are finalized.

In a statement responding to the audit, MTA Chairman and CEO Joseph Lhota called the results "not fact-based" and "worthless", also accusing the comptroller's basis of "overt bias" against both the MTA and Apple in declaring that the process was not open and transparent.

Top Rated Comments

JBunkers Avatar
184 months ago
Who's slanted here?

So the state comptroller conducts an audit which finds that the state comptroller should have more power?

I think the audit is "at a minimum severely slanted toward the Comptroller". :rolleyes:
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
shartypants Avatar
184 months ago
What a waste of taxpayer money doing the audit, sometimes I think government people just look for ways to justify their jobs instead of doing something useful.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ConCat Avatar
184 months ago
Looks like the free market is dead. Apple got favorable treatment because having an Apple store in you station increases revenue from all of your shops due to increased foot traffic. I don't see how this is any of their concern. Clearly, people have been enjoying the Apple store.

Really, the free market is a beautiful thing. It works well, and both sides are happy. You give me a product or service I want, and I give you money so you can buy a product or service you want. Really, that's all there is to it. We have not lived in a true free market for almost a century now.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
184 months ago
the state is proposing increased oversight on competitive public authority contracts, a move which give the comptroller's office more authority to examine such agreements before they are finalized.

Translation: Nobody asked us, nobody greased our pockets.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Mad-B-One Avatar
184 months ago
Looks like the free market is dead. Apple got favorable treatment because having an Apple store in you station increases revenue from all of your shops due to increased foot traffic. I don't see how this is any of their concern. Clearly, people have been enjoying the Apple store.

Really, the free market is a beautiful thing. It works well, and both sides are happy. You give me a product or service I want, and I give you money so you can buy a product or service you want. Really, that's all there is to it. We have not lived in a true free market for almost a century now.

I agree with you but I also think that a free market is not needed for Pareto efficiency. To be honest, this was a mutual goal of MTA and Apple to get the store there. The reason why the bidding wasn't "open" is quite simple: No one would be able to outbid the benefits an Apple Store gets to Central Station simply because of the traffic effect. MTA was looking for a magnet, Apple for a location. Now, find one business (other than a casino) that would have the same effect and would pay the renovation needed and can (and is willing to) pay the rent on top of it.

PS: The auditor should also read up on the Nash equilibrium... that would help and point towards the flaws in his arguments.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Swift Avatar
184 months ago
Politics. If somebody couldn't put up $5 million, how on earth could they lease the space? Who exactly was cut out? Look no further than the Murdoch filth, the NY Post. Is some different series of regulations necessary? Maybe so. Note: this is a great business deal for Grand Central. Any businessman would see that. But apparently, the Post never saw a public bureaucracy they liked. Gee, was Bain Capital thinking of buying Grand Central and moving it to Mexico?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iOS 27 Next to iPhone

Here's When iOS 27 Rolls Out Today in Every Time Zone [Update: It's Out]

Sunday September 13, 2026 3:00 am PDT by
Update 10:04 a.m.: iOS 27 is rolling out now, though it may take a bit for all users to see it, so keep checking! Apple is about to release iOS 27, which will finally deliver more advanced Siri AI capabilities as well as a variety of other refinements, improvements, and new features to iPhones. It's Apple's biggest software update of the year, and Apple announced at Wednesday's iPhone event...
iOS 27 Icon iPhone

iOS 27 Available Now With These 8 New Features

Monday September 14, 2026 9:00 am PDT by
Update — 10 a.m. Pacific Time: Apple has released iOS 27. During its iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone Duo event last week, Apple announced that iOS 27 will be released widely on Monday, September 14. iOS 27 should be available around 10 a.m. Pacific Time / 1 p.m. Eastern Time today via the Settings app, under General → Software Update. Below, we have highlighted eight new features and...
Apple iCloud Plus expansion hero

iCloud+ Now Includes Apple TV, Apple Arcade, and Curated Apple Music Stations in Over 100 Countries

Tuesday September 15, 2026 1:43 am PDT by
Apple today announced a new subscription initiative that turns paid iCloud+ subscriptions into a broader services bundle in more than 100 countries. In select countries, Apple says every paid iCloud+ plan, including the cheapest 50GB tier, now includes Apple TV and Apple Arcade "at no additional cost," while family sharing extends the storage, TV and Arcade access to up to five people....