Major News Outlets Seek Permission to Share Steve Jobs' iPod Lawsuit Deposition Video - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Major News Outlets Seek Permission to Share Steve Jobs' iPod Lawsuit Deposition Video

Some of the last known video of Steve Jobs, from the deposition tape that was played in court last Friday, may be made public as a group of lawyers representing CNN, Bloomberg, and the Associated Press filed a motion earlier this week to have it released (via CNET).

Up until now, both Apple and the plaintiffs in the case have asked the court to consider the video "regular testimony," which would prevent it from being shown outside the court walls. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has not yet sealed the evidence, however, leaving open the possibility of the video being made publicly available. Representing all three media outlets, attorney Thomas Burke cited public interest as a major argument for releasing the video.

"Given the substantial public interest in the rare posthumous appearance of Steve Jobs in this trial, there simply is no interest that justifies restricting the public's access to his video deposition," attorney Thomas Burke wrote in the filing Monday.

steve-jobs-iphone
Burke sent an official email request to broadcast the video on Sunday, to which Apple's lead attorney, Bill Isaacson replied, "Apple does not consent to your request. We are preparing a substantive response to your points and will get that to you tonight hopefully."

Jobs' deposition video is acting as evidence in the ongoing lawsuit dating back to 2005 that sees Apple facing accusations of attempting to enforce a monopoly over the iPod and iTunes by shutting out competing services.

In the video, Jobs echoed much of the same sentiment Apple has expressed in the case so far, stating that "We had pretty much black and white contracts with the labels," and that preventing the iPod from playing music from competing music services was "collateral damage."

Apple has yet to comment on the attempt to make the video public since Isaacson's initial response. According to the plaintiff's lawyers in the iPod case, whether or not the deposition video is released to the public is entirely up to Apple.

Popular Stories

Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple Says CarPlay Ultra is Coming to These Vehicle Brands

Thursday May 21, 2026 11:53 am PDT by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly a year later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. CarPlay Ultra...
iphone 18 pro blue%402x

iPhone 18 Pro: Dark Cherry, Light Blue, and Dark Gray Chassis Leaked [Update]

Thursday June 4, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Update: Since publication, new information has come to light suggesting the images have been AI-manipulated and are not in fact iPhone 18 Pro chassis parts. The original article follows. The color options Apple is reportedly planning for the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18 Pro‌ Max have appeared online today in the form of images of chassis parts of unknown authenticity....
iOS 27 All the New App Features

iOS 27: All the Rumored App Features

Wednesday June 3, 2026 3:48 pm PDT by
Siri is getting a major overhaul in iOS 27, but Apple also has some big updates planned for apps like Camera, Photos, and Wallet. There are multiple new AI features in the works, plus some non-AI upgrades. Camera Apple is moving Visual Intelligence from the Camera Control button to the Camera app in iOS 27, according to Bloomberg. There will be a Siri mode that will be available alongside...

Top Rated Comments

gibbz Avatar
150 months ago
This seems more like a Steve Jobs fetishism from the media than a genuine concern about public interest.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Traverse Avatar
150 months ago
I can picture Apple's response (if it was (is) up to them)...

MacRumors content image
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
150 months ago
Given the substantial public interest...

Translation: Think of all the clicks we could get if we had that video!
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gnasher729 Avatar
150 months ago
Public interest is a reason to release evidence? That sounds a bit strange to me.

I think these lawyers are confusing "in the public interest" with "things that a nosy public is interested in".
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
4jasontv Avatar
150 months ago
Will so much public interest in what Steve had to say, you would think it would be easier to make a movie about him.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Solomani Avatar
150 months ago
In other words…. the big media networks are still trying to cash in on the Cult of Steve Jobs. The Deification of the Demigod known as Steve Jobs.

They want to be the first to show this video clip of the deceased deity. And they hope that it will bring tons of click-views, and revenue, to their websites and news programs.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)