AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers

Last month the United States Federal Communications Commission announced that it would fine AT&T $100 million for misleading customers about its unlimited data plans and not adequately warning customers about throttling their data speeds. AT&T has since responded, arguing that data throttling doesn't harm customers, the company is being prejudged and that its First Amendment rights are being violated in a response first found by The Hill (via Ars Technica).

ATT Logo

The Commission’s findings that consumers and competition were harmed are devoid of factual support and wholly implausible. Its “moderate” forfeiture penalty of $100 million is plucked out of thin air, and the injunctive sanctions it proposes are beyond the Commission’s authority. Both, moreover, reflect an unseemly effort to coerce settlement. And the NAL and the related press campaign confirm that the agency has already prejudged AT&T’s liability, abandoning any pretext that the Commission remains an impartial arbiter of the case.

AT&T, who wants the FCC to drop the fine, claims that it has made all the required disclosures to customers, pointing out that its Unlimited Data Plan customers were more likely to renew their contracts than non-Unlimited Data Plan customers. Additionally, the telecommunications company argued the FCC would be outside of its authority in both imposing the fine and making other requests because the statute of limitations on the case has passed.

Lastly, AT&T argued that the FCC has no authority to order the company to inform its customers that it violated the Transparency Rule in not telling them about speed changes when throttling data because the statement would both be untrue and a violation of AT&T's First Amendment rights.

AT&T ceased selling Unlimited Data Plans years ago but continues to have customers grandfathered to its Unlimited Data Plans. Previously, the company throttled its Unlimited Data Plan customers once they exceeded 5 GB of LTE data, but in May the company changed its policy to only throttle customers when connected to a cell tower experiencing network congestion.

Tags: AT&T, FCC

Popular Stories

Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple Says CarPlay Ultra is Coming to These Vehicle Brands

Thursday May 21, 2026 11:53 am PDT by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly a year later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. CarPlay Ultra...
iphone 18 pro blue%402x

iPhone 18 Pro: Dark Cherry, Light Blue, and Dark Gray Chassis Leaked [Update]

Thursday June 4, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Update: Since publication, new information has come to light suggesting the images have been AI-manipulated and are not in fact iPhone 18 Pro chassis parts. The original article follows. The color options Apple is reportedly planning for the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18 Pro‌ Max have appeared online today in the form of images of chassis parts of unknown authenticity....
iOS 27 All the New App Features

iOS 27: All the Rumored App Features

Wednesday June 3, 2026 3:48 pm PDT by
Siri is getting a major overhaul in iOS 27, but Apple also has some big updates planned for apps like Camera, Photos, and Wallet. There are multiple new AI features in the works, plus some non-AI upgrades. Camera Apple is moving Visual Intelligence from the Camera Control button to the Camera app in iOS 27, according to Bloomberg. There will be a Siri mode that will be available alongside...

Top Rated Comments

CrEsTo Avatar
142 months ago
I'll throttle my bill payment, surely it won't 'harm' AT&T.
Score: 115 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jonfarr Avatar
142 months ago
I'm fine with the throttling personally. It's the only realistic way for everyone to have an uninterrupted connection. They're not doing anything to warrant a $100M fine.

It's like fining the water company for not "adequately warning customers" that when they use a kinked garden hose, they won't get the full pressure.
Do you work for ATT? This is crazy talk. A kinked water hose as you comparison to the water company? A better comparison would be that the water company decided you took too long of showers and cut your psi so that you couldn't even take a shower, but you would still get a drip to come out as to not technically cut your service. And that would be ridiculous just like ATTs throttling of unlimited data that was sold as no strings attached, only to attach those strings when they saw fit.
Score: 74 Votes (Like | Disagree)
nepalisherpa Avatar
142 months ago
Oh AT&T, you are such a comedian!
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
duffman9000 Avatar
142 months ago
I'm fine with the throttling personally. It's the only realistic way for everyone to have an uninterrupted connection. They're not doing anything to warrant a $100M fine.

It's like fining the water company for not "adequately warning customers" that when they use a kinked garden hose, they won't get the full pressure.
AT&T used to throttle me the instant I went over 5GB, even if no network congestion. The throttling was in effect until my billing cycle was up. And as for your silly water hose analogy, I can unkink my hose. I can't unkink my connection.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
lenslord Avatar
142 months ago
If they fight it, double it. … If they fight it again, double it again. Their only interest is money, make screwing the customers expensive. They will understand expensive.


Article Link: AT&T Urges FCC to Drop $100 Million Fine, Says Data Throttling Doesn't Harm Customers ('https://www.macrumors.com/2015/07/29/att-responds-fcc-100-million-fine/')
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
142 months ago
Sure, no harm involved. I could have lost my job because I couldn't connect to the internet at a reasonable speed. I could barely send an email with the throttled speed. Absolutely absurd statement on ATT's part.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)