FBI Serves Apple Warrant to Gain US Senator's iCloud Data - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

FBI Serves Apple Warrant to Gain US Senator's iCloud Data

iCloud AltApple has been served a warrant by the FBI to obtain information on the iCloud account of U.S. Senator Richard Burr, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who is being investigated for controversial stock trades linked to the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the Los Angeles Times, FBI agents served Apple the warrant "in recent days" to gain access to the ‌iCloud‌ data. The information gathered from the warrant's execution was then used as evidence to serve another warrant to obtain the Republican senator's iPhone from his home.

Federal agents seized a cellphone belonging to a prominent Republican senator on Wednesday night as part of the Justice Department's investigation into controversial stock trades he made as the novel coronavirus first struck the U.S., a law enforcement official said. Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, turned over his phone to agents after they served a search warrant on the lawmaker at his residence in the Washington area, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a law enforcement action.

According to the report, the Senator is being investigated for selling a significant percentage of his stock portfolio in 33 different transactions on February 13, just as his committee was receiving daily COVID-19 briefings and a week before the stock market sharply declined.

The value of the trades is believed to be between $628,000 and $1.72 million. Much of that was said to have been invested in businesses that in subsequent weeks were hit hard by the plunging market, the implication being that the trades were made on the basis of information Burr received about the pandemic in the daily briefings.

Apple can decrypt an ‌iCloud‌ backup and provide the information to authorities when ordered to do so via a warrant, because the company views privacy and security issues differently between physical devices that can be lost and ‌iCloud‌. With ‌iCloud‌, it needs to be accessible by Apple so that it can restore the data for the user.

‌iCloud‌ backups contain iMessages and texts, content purchase history, photos and videos, device settings, app data, voicemail password, and health data. Backups don't include information that's easily downloadable, such as emails from servers or apps, and while ‌iCloud‌ backup does encompass ‌iCloud‌ keychain, Wi-Fi passwords, and passwords for third-party services, that information is encrypted in a way that makes it inaccessible to Apple.

More than two years ago, Apple reportedly informed the FBI that it planned to roll out end-to-end encryption for ‌iCloud‌ backups, but ultimately dropped the plan at some point after the FBI objected, although it remains unclear if the federal agency was a factor in the decision.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Tags: FBI, iCloud

Popular Stories

iCloud General Feature Redux

iCloud+ Subscribers Get Higher Apple Intelligence Usage Limits in iOS 27

Tuesday June 9, 2026 6:05 am PDT by
Certain Apple Intelligence features in iOS 27 will carry daily usage limits, with iCloud+ subscribers receiving higher allowances than free users. The company reiterated the details in its press release accompanying yesterday's Apple Intelligence announcements. Apple said the limits apply to features that rely on "powerful server models," with image generation cited as the primary example....
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

iPhone Users Who Pay for iCloud Storage Get Two New Perks on iOS 27

Thursday July 2, 2026 6:10 am PDT by
If you pay for certain iCloud+ storage plans beyond the 5GB that Apple offers for free, you will receive two more perks on iOS 27 at no additional cost. A summary of the two new iCloud+ perks on iOS 27:Increased daily usage limits for some new Apple Intelligence features, including image generation in the revamped Image Playground app. HomeKit Secure Video cameras receive generated video...
iCloud General Feature Redux

Apple's New Hide My Email Domain Makes It Easier to Block iCloud Aliases

Wednesday June 17, 2026 7:41 am PDT by
Apple's decision to move Hide My Email to a dedicated "private.icloud.com" domain appears to have the consequence of making it easier for platforms that want to block iCloud aliases to do so. Apple is unifying the email domains used by Sign in with Apple and iCloud+ Hide My Email under a single private.icloud.com domain later this summer. Sign in with Apple currently uses...

Top Rated Comments

mw360 Avatar
80 months ago

No mention of Senator Feinstein? She dumped shares as well.
Out of the 4 senators under scrutiny, Burr is the only one whose initial statement admitted to making the sales personally. The others claimed their portfolios were managed by third parties, which presumably the FBI was able to easily verify.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
paulvee Avatar
80 months ago

This so much. I like how the article doesn’t even mention her and nothing ever happened to her. I guess you have to be Republican for it to be ilegal 🙄
Don’t be such a victim.

Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
80 months ago

This so much. I like how the article doesn’t even mention her and nothing ever happened to her. I guess you have to be Republican for it to be ilegal 🙄
No, you need to have personally exploited privileged information unavailable to others.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
RogerWilco Avatar
80 months ago
No mention of Senator Feinstein? She dumped shares as well.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
80 months ago

Good thing I didn't sell my stock on Feb 13 or I be under investigation too. Oh wait. I'm not a congressman so it okay for me to do so.
More importantly, you did not have access to privileged information, unavailable to others, that you could exploit to your benefit.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
80 months ago

Agreed but that’s not what happened. She has information about what was going on and gave it to her husband so he could sell their stock
That's a very serious charge, one that should not be made lightly. Can you present evidence to support your allegation?
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)