Apple Developers Required to Justify Use of Some APIs in Latest Move to Boost Privacy - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Developers Required to Justify Use of Some APIs in Latest Move to Boost Privacy

In an effort to bolster user privacy, developers will need to justify their use of certain Apple APIs before their apps can be listed on the App Store, according to a new article on the Apple developer website spotted by 9to5Mac.

iOS App Store General Feature Desaturated
The Apple Developer website now lists some APIs as "Required Reason APIs," meaning that developers have to clarify why they are using them in their privacy manifest. Some commonly used APIs, such as UserDefaults, which stores user preferences, now fall under the Required Reason category.

With the launch of watchOS 10, iOS 17, iPadOS 17, tvOS 17, and macOS Sonoma later this year, developers will receive a warning if they submit apps using a Required Reason API without specifying its usage. From spring 2024, any apps using these APIs without a legitimate justification will be rejected in the review process.

Apple explains that main reason for this change is to curb fingerprinting, a method used to track users across different apps and websites. Fingerprinting uses API calls to gather details about a user's device, such as screen resolution, model, and operating system. This data is then used to create a unique "fingerprint," enabling the user to be identified across various apps or websites.

According to Apple, Required Reason APIs will guarantee that apps only employ these APIs for their prescribed use. In the event of a rejection, Apple will permit developers to contest the decision and submit a request for approval if their case does not fit within the existing guidelines. See the Apple Developer website for more information.

Popular Stories

macOS 27 on MacBook Pro

Apple Says macOS 27 Won't Be Compatible With These Macs

Wednesday June 3, 2026 8:29 am PDT by
During WWDC 2025, Apple revealed that macOS 26 Tahoe would be the final major macOS version for Intel-based Macs. macOS 27 will be compatible with Apple silicon Macs only, meaning that you will need a Mac with an M-series chip or a MacBook Neo with an A18 Pro chip in order to install the software update. Apple will unveil macOS 27 during its WWDC 2026 keynote this Monday, June 8, and the...
MacBook Neo on Yellow Feature

MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production

Wednesday June 3, 2026 9:24 am PDT by
On an earnings call in late April, Apple's CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo was "off the charts," and the popularity of the laptop has reportedly led the company to significantly boost production. Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo this week said he believes that MacBook Neo shipments to Apple were doubled from an initial target of 5 million units to 10...
iphone 18 pro blue%402x

iPhone 18 Pro: Dark Cherry, Light Blue, and Dark Gray Chassis Leaked [Update]

Thursday June 4, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Update: Since publication, new information has come to light suggesting the images have been AI-manipulated and are not in fact iPhone 18 Pro chassis parts. The original article follows. The color options Apple is reportedly planning for the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18 Pro‌ Max have appeared online today in the form of images of chassis parts of unknown authenticity....

Top Rated Comments

fatTribble Avatar
37 months ago
I applaud efforts like these from Apple. Anything to enhance privacy for end users is a win in my book. 🤓🥰👏
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
37 months ago

As a developer I can't tell you how much of a pain this is going to be.
As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
37 months ago

As a developer I don't see this being much of a hindrance. I already justify my code by writing comments.

I can't really see someone thinking "Wait, I have to justify my code? That's outrageous!"
I like your attitude towards it, instead of “oh it’s going to be a pain” which gives me little faith in a developer to protect my privacy because it’s too inconvenient for them
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Zc456 Avatar
37 months ago
I can already hear Zuck yelling in frustration from within Facebook HQ.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
fatTribble Avatar
37 months ago

Good for privacy reason, however how much apps will slip through QC and checks? Many stories how fraudulent apps slipped through. The Apple App Store was once the example of quality apps compared to it's Android counterpart. Now it just feels like Android Junk.
Any gaps in QC can be improved over time. Because they potentially don’t catch everything doesn’t mean they should just give up.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
VulchR Avatar
37 months ago
Actually, as a consumer I want companies collecting as little information as possible about me. Indeed, I think they should pay for the privilege of collecting my personal information. I'd like the same to apply for web sites, but I recognise I am in a minority with this view.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)