Epic Games Accuses Samsung and Google of Colluding to Prevent Sideloading on Galaxy Devices - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Epic Games Accuses Samsung and Google of Colluding to Prevent Sideloading on Galaxy Devices

Fortnite creator Epic Games today filed a lawsuit against Google and Samsung, accusing the two companies of anticompetitive behavior that discourages Android users from downloading games and apps outside of the Google Play Store.

play store google
At issue is a Samsung feature called Auto Blocker, which is designed to prevent Galaxy devices from installing applications from unauthorized sources. Enabled by default, Samsung says that Auto Blocker keeps users safe from unknown apps and malware, but it does disable sideloading.

With Auto Blocker, when users attempt to install an app from an unknown or unauthorized source, they'll receive a pop-up alert letting them know that installation was prevented. Auto Blocker can be overridden during the setup of a Galaxy device, and there is also an option to temporarily remove it. Auto Blocker was first introduced last October, and ‌Epic Games‌ says that the feature is in fact a "coordinated effort" to block competition in app distribution.

"Auto Blocker cements the Google Play Store as the only viable way to get apps on Samsung devices, blocking every other store from competing on a level playing field," says ‌Epic Games‌.

‌Epic Games‌ is accusing Samsung and Google of creating Auto Blocker with the purpose of undermining the result of the Epic Games v. Google lawsuit, where a nine-member jury agreed that Google had an app store monopoly and that Google's agreements with OEMs were anticompetitive.

When speaking to journalists earlier today (via The Verge), ‌Epic Games‌ CEO Tim Sweeney said that he did not have proof that Google and Samsung had colluded on the Auto Blocker feature, but he is hoping to find evidence during the document discovery process. He also did not ask Samsung to make ‌Epic Games‌ an authorized source for games.

Further, Sweeney claimed that Epic was filing the lawsuit on behalf of all developers, and not just to get ‌Epic Games‌ special treatment. "If we'd fought Epic v. Apple and Epic v. Google solely on the basis of Epic getting special privileges, perhaps settlement discussions with Apple and Google might have been fruitful," said Sweeney. "But if we did that, we'd be selling out all developers."

Evidence from the Epic v. Apple trial suggests that Sweeney did, at that time, seek a special deal with Apple that would not have been available to all developers. In 2020, Sweeney wrote a letter to Apple asking for permission to add support for third-party payment processors in Fortnite, and it's only when Apple said no that Epic filed a lawsuit against Apple. When questioned about this letter at trial, Sweeney confirmed that he was seeking a special deal for Fortnite and would have accepted it even if Apple didn't offer the same deal to other developers.

Sweeney has suggested multiple times that the lawsuits Epic is filing against Apple, Google, and Samsung are for all developers, but realistically, ‌Epic Games‌ is looking out for its own interests.

‌Epic Games‌ is aiming to have the court force Samsung to remove Auto Blocker as a default device setting. Samsung in a statement to The Verge said that Auto Blocker is a security and privacy feature that users can disable at any time. "We plan to vigorously contest Epic Game's baseless claims," said Samsung. Google called the lawsuit "meritless."

Popular Stories

Foldable iPhone 2023 Feature Iridescent 1

Apple Approves Production of OLED Panels for Foldable iPhone

Monday June 22, 2026 8:00 am PDT by
Samsung Display has received Apple's approval to begin module production of OLED panels for Apple's first foldable iPhone, according to a report today from TheElec. Citing industry sources, the report says Samsung Display has started operating part of its back-end production lines in Vietnam to fulfill an initial order of around three million panels scheduled for delivery this year. Module...
Apple Silicon AI Optimized Feature Siri

Apple's Overhauled Siri Will Reportedly Run on Nvidia's Blackwell Chips

Thursday June 4, 2026 2:38 am PDT by
Apple will rely on Google's fleet of Nvidia chips to power its overhauled version of Siri when it launches in September, according to a new report from The Information. Last week, the outlet reported that Apple plans to highlight the on-device AI capabilities of its devices at WWDC next week, but queries that require cloud-based processing will still fall back on one of Google's large Gemini ...
Apple Intelligence General Feature 2

Google Gemini Could Be the Ceiling on Apple's AI Ambitions

Monday June 8, 2026 5:31 am PDT by
Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo says the real test of today's WWDC keynote is whether Apple can deliver better AI experiences than Google using the same Gemini models. Apple is using Google's Gemini to underpin the revamped version of Siri and new Apple Intelligence features. The key takeaway from WWDC, Kuo argues in a new post on X, will not be the short-term market reaction after the event. It...

Top Rated Comments

GMShadow Avatar
23 months ago

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said that he did not have proof that Google and Samsung had colluded on the Auto Blocker feature, but he is hoping to find evidence during the document discovery process.
This should result in a dismissal with prejudice.
Score: 54 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Naraxus Avatar
23 months ago
"Has no evidence but is hoping to find something"

Tim Sweeny is ****ing scuzzbag in every sense of the word. As usual he wants to have his cake and eat it too.

He has done absolutely nothing to better technology
Score: 51 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
23 months ago
I look forward to the EU declaring that this important safety feature has no business being on by default.
Score: 44 Votes (Like | Disagree)
techfreak23 Avatar
23 months ago
When is this guy finally going to **** off?
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago
Filing suit alleging collusion, without evidence of any collusion, over a feature that users can freely turn on & off as they please is textbook Epic / Sweeny.
Score: 33 Votes (Like | Disagree)
23 months ago
Is this Epic's entire business plan? To just sue and complain, sue and complain, ad nauseam? The feature is ostensibly a very good safety feature. Absent any evidence of collusion, meh, the suit should be dismissed with prejudice.
Score: 32 Votes (Like | Disagree)