'M4 Extreme' Chip Unlikely After Apple 'Cancels' High-Performance Chip [Updated] - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

'M4 Extreme' Chip Unlikely After Apple 'Cancels' High-Performance Chip [Updated]

Apple this "past summer" canceled the development of a high-performance Mac chip that would have consisted of four smaller chips stitched together, in order to free up engineering resources for a planned AI server chip, according to The Information.

M4 Extreme Cancelled
Based on the report's description of the chip, it sounds like Apple has canceled a previously-rumored "Extreme" chip for the Mac. It was previously reported that an "M2 Extreme" chip was scrapped a few years ago, but perhaps Apple had revisited the idea since then. In any case, it now sounds like an "M4 Extreme" chip is also unlikely.

Apple likely would have introduced the "M4 Extreme" in its high-end Mac Pro tower. The chip would have offered even faster performance than the M4 Ultra chip that is expected to launch in new Mac Studio and Mac Pro models later next year.

If the "M4 Extreme" were to have been a quadrupled version of the M4 Max chip that debuted in the MacBook Pro a few months ago, it would have had massive specifications, including up to a 64-core CPU and up to a 160-core GPU.

While the "Extreme" chip may be off the table once again, it seems like Apple has repeatedly shown interest in developing such a chip, so perhaps it will eventually materialize as part of the M5 series or later. For now, though, the wait continues.

Update: After this story was published, Daring Fireball's John Gruber made a good point about how there is a long, multi-year gap between Apple designing and shipping new chips. Accordingly, it is possible the latest chip canceled actually would have been an "M5 Extreme" chip or later if development was only recently ended.

Buyer's Guide: Mac Pro (Don't Buy)
Related Forum: Mac Pro

Popular Stories

Apple Silicon AI Optimized Feature Siri

Apple's Overhauled Siri Will Reportedly Run on Nvidia's Blackwell Chips

Thursday June 4, 2026 2:38 am PDT by
Apple will rely on Google's fleet of Nvidia chips to power its overhauled version of Siri when it launches in September, according to a new report from The Information. Last week, the outlet reported that Apple plans to highlight the on-device AI capabilities of its devices at WWDC next week, but queries that require cloud-based processing will still fall back on one of Google's large Gemini ...
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

iPhone Users Who Pay for iCloud Storage Get Two New Perks on iOS 27

Thursday July 2, 2026 6:10 am PDT by
If you pay for certain iCloud+ storage plans beyond the 5GB that Apple offers for free, you will receive two more perks on iOS 27 at no additional cost. A summary of the two new iCloud+ perks on iOS 27:Increased daily usage limits for some new Apple Intelligence features, including image generation in the revamped Image Playground app. HomeKit Secure Video cameras receive generated video...
American Express Gold Apple Pay Feature

American Express Announces New Apple Pay Feature

Tuesday June 30, 2026 10:27 am PDT by
American Express today announced that you can now redeem Membership Rewards points when checking out with Apple Pay on the web and in apps on the iPhone and iPad. When checking out with Apple Pay on iOS 18 or iPadOS 18 or later, tap on your eligible American Express card (Platinum, Gold, Green, and others) and select the Membership Rewards points option. You can use points to cover all or...

Top Rated Comments

CWallace Avatar
20 months ago

I've been wondering for years now why Apple doesn't make another dual processor Mac Pro, like they've done in the PPC and early Intel days.
The Apple Silicon architecture may not be designed for multi-processor operations so performance would not scale and you may hit issues with memory access and cache coherency.

This sounds like what is happening with these "Extreme" SoCs - the Ultra is not twice as good as the Max even though it is two Max connected directly. Two Ultras talking to each other across an external connection on a motherboard would be even worse.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Jack Burton Avatar
20 months ago
Just bring out the M4 Max/ultra studio, please!



Attachment Image
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jb310 Avatar
20 months ago
It was really going to be called Extreme?

I guess we should pour one out for M4 Radical, M4 Totally Awesome, and M4 Most Excellent Dude. 🏄‍♂️
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
20 months ago
This is anecdotal, but I got a M1 Ultra a couple years back to test out training some large LLM models that wouldn’t fit on NVIDIA chips like an RTX 6000 Ada. The latter has 48Gb VRAM, while the M1 Ultra has ~98Gb VRAM effectively, albeit at much slower training speeds.

It did fine for a few models, but then something bizarre happened - anything with an odd numbered batch size returned only infinite gradients and nan losses. Even numbered batch sizes could kind of train, but gradients exploded frequently. I couldn’t replicate this on my NVIDIA hardware or even a Mac M3 Max chip.

Only a hypothesis on my end, but I worry that the dye connection between chips is fragile and prone to error, particularly with these demanding high throughput actions. This can lead to otherwise normal Mac behavior, but render it useless with AI applications. My Mac M1 is still under Apple Care, but I don’t know how to even begin to describe the problem to Apple support.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
PsykX Avatar
20 months ago
Without a different chip, the Mac Pro is dead to me :

The Mac Pro (base model) is 63% more expensive than Mac Studio.
The Mac Pro is 4.7X heavier than Mac Studio.
The Mac Pro is 14.4X bigger than Mac Studio.

The Mac Pro is exactly as powerful as Mac Studio.

I mean, it was already a niche computer before, now it's a niche of a niche.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
turbineseaplane Avatar
20 months ago

Apple maybe realized there's not enough demand for an Extreme chip to justify the cost of design and production.
Potential buyers of Extreme chip machines simply can't trust Apple to support them and their needs.

They've rug pulled these users over and over, and the vast majority have moved on with no interest in coming back to this sort of "relationship"

The onus is on Apple to ever show the world it can stay focused and committed to long term support that truly high end pro users demand and need.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)