In-Depth iPhone Battery Experiment Pits Slow Charging Against Fast Charging - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

In-Depth iPhone Battery Experiment Pits Slow Charging Against Fast Charging

HTX Studio this week shared the results from a six-month battery test that compared how fast charging and slow charging can affect battery life over time.


Using six iPhone 12 models, the channel set up a system to drain the batteries from five percent and charge them to 100 percent over and over again. Three were fast charged, and three were slow charged.

Another set of iPhones underwent the same test, but with charging initiated at 30 percent and stopped at 80 percent, so the iPhones were always in that range.

Prior to the experiment, the capacity for each phone was tested, and after 500 cycles, the capacity was tested again. The results suggest there is minimal additional battery drain from fast charging, but keeping an iPhone between 30 and 80 percent charge could be minimally beneficial.

HTX Studio concluded that the best way to charge an iPhone is "however you like," without overthinking it and trading mental energy for a tiny bit of battery life. The same video also includes Android tests, and is well worth watching in full for those curious about the effects of fast charging.

Popular Stories

macOS 27 on MacBook Pro

Apple Says macOS 27 Won't Be Compatible With These Macs

Wednesday June 3, 2026 8:29 am PDT by
During WWDC 2025, Apple revealed that macOS 26 Tahoe would be the final major macOS version for Intel-based Macs. macOS 27 will be compatible with Apple silicon Macs only, meaning that you will need a Mac with an M-series chip or a MacBook Neo with an A18 Pro chip in order to install the software update. Apple will unveil macOS 27 during its WWDC 2026 keynote this Monday, June 8, and the...
MacBook Neo on Yellow Feature

MacBook Neo is So Popular That Apple Reportedly Doubled Production

Wednesday June 3, 2026 9:24 am PDT by
On an earnings call in late April, Apple's CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo was "off the charts," and the popularity of the laptop has reportedly led the company to significantly boost production. Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo this week said he believes that MacBook Neo shipments to Apple were doubled from an initial target of 5 million units to 10...
iphone 18 pro blue%402x

iPhone 18 Pro: Dark Cherry, Light Blue, and Dark Gray Chassis Leaked [Update]

Thursday June 4, 2026 5:18 am PDT by
Update: Since publication, new information has come to light suggesting the images have been AI-manipulated and are not in fact iPhone 18 Pro chassis parts. The original article follows. The color options Apple is reportedly planning for the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro and ‌iPhone 18 Pro‌ Max have appeared online today in the form of images of chassis parts of unknown authenticity....

Top Rated Comments

cateye Avatar
8 months ago
Telling people to not “overthink” battery life and charging, and backing it up with data, is going to absolutely rock the world of a great number of posters in the iPhone forum. Thoughts and prayers.
Score: 123 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dustin_ Avatar
8 months ago
wow, just like every other battery test. replace your battery if/when it falls under 80%. otherwise, use your phone as you see fit, folks.
Score: 43 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
This comes up a lot and every test is more or less the same.

Marginal benefits if you make some pretty significant compromises every day for forever.

If you only charge to 80%, your capacity will hold slightly longer. Capacity that... you're not using.

If you fast charge every day for years all the way to 100%; you'll still have 80% capacity at the end of several years. Capacity that you would've been artificially limiting yourself to the entire time.

Feels very "cover the couch in plastic" to me. Sure I guess it improves it somewhat; but is it worth not getting to actually use the "thing"?

And ultimately, battery replacements from Apple are both reasonably priced and available for a very long time, with third party options virtually indefinitely.

I keep my phones for a really long time so, in theory, I'm the one this information most benefits. The only thing I actually do is make sure to use a slow charger on my nightstand. When I plug it in at night, it's going to be plugged in for the next several hours so there's no benefit to fast charging. Beyond that, it gets hit with a fast charger if I ever need to charge in the middle of the day. Always to 100%. And after 3-4 years the battery capacity starts to get noticeably poorer. A hundred bucks (give or take) at the Apple Store (free with AppleCare+) and I walk away with a brand new battery. And most people will have replaced their phone long before then.
Score: 42 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago

It just doesn’t make sense to limit yourself to stay within a range now to possibly save a few percentages later.
The 80% crowd isn’t going to like that lol.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago
I've always been a fan of the idea that your phone (or any device) should work for you, not the other way around. If it is easy for you to manage your battery, great. But don't work so hard for it. You are unlikely to significantly change the usable life of a modern battery and compared to the effort some people put into it, it is not a smart trade.

I've always felt the same way about OSes. You shouldn't have to work so hard to keep your OS organized, secure, updated, etc., again, you got a computer/device to improve your life, not complicate it.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
8 months ago

It just doesn’t make sense to limit yourself to stay within a range now to possibly save a few percentage points later.
For sure.

If you limit yourself to 80% then after 4 or 5 years you can avoid a battery that only... has 80% of it's capacity left?

What exactly have you accomplished?

Let's imagine a phone owned for 6 years. One person limits it to 80% and has 80% capacity for 6 years. The other person doesn't limit it at all and ends up with 80% capacity and maybe a smidge under for a year or two?

...I really don't get it. Like genuinely. How is the first scenario not the obviously, clearly, no brainer, no question worse scenario? How is a capacity life of 100, 96, 92, 88, 82, 80 better than a capacity lifetime by year of 80, 80, 80, 80, 80, 80?
Score: 28 Votes (Like | Disagree)