Apple Faces Polish Antitrust Probe Over App Tracking Transparency - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Faces Polish Antitrust Probe Over App Tracking Transparency

Poland's antitrust regulator is investigating whether Apple is restricting competition in the mobile ads market through its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework, reports Reuters.

generic tracking prompt orange
Introduced in April 2021 with the release of iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5, Apple's ATT framework requires that all apps on ‌iPhone‌ and ‌iPad‌ ask for the user's consent before tracking their activity across other apps. Apps that wish to track a user based on their device's unique advertising identifier can only do so if the user allows it when prompted.

Apple said the feature was designed to protect users and not to advantage the company. It has been unsurprisingly unpopular with advertisers and data brokers.

Poland's anti-monopoly office, UOKiK, suspects that Apple's ATT framework could be favoring the company's own ads service by limiting the ability of third-party apps to collect user data for personalized ads.

"We suspect that the ATT policy may have misled users about the level of privacy protection while simultaneously increasing Apple’s competitive advantage over independent publishers," UOKiK President Tomasz Chrostny was quoted as saying in a statement. "Such practices may constitute an abuse of dominant position."

If the regulator finds its suspicions to be warranted, Apple could face a fine of up to 10% of its annual turnover in Poland.

In an emailed statement to Reuters, Apple said:

"It is no surprise that the data tracking industry continues to oppose our efforts to give users back control over their data, and now intense pressure could force us to withdraw this feature, to the detriment of European consumers."

"We will work with the Polish competition authority to ensure Apple can continue to offer users this valuable privacy tool."

Regulators in Germany, Italy, and Romania have opened similar probes to examine whether the privacy feature violates competition rules by impeding access to essential data for advertising while reinforcing Apple's own position in the digital ad market.

In March, Apple was fined €150 million ($162 million) by France's Competition Authority over the framework's implementation.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Criticizes U.S. Antitrust Bill That Targets the App Store

Thursday June 11, 2026 2:49 pm PDT by
United States Senators Chuck Grassley and Amy Klobuchar this week reintroduced the American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA) that targets major tech companies like Apple, and Apple is not happy to see it back. The bipartisan bill is reminiscent of the Digital Markets Act in the European Union, banning large platforms from favoring their own products or services, limiting competitors' ...
iCloud General Feature Redux

Apple Faces First Italian DMA Probe on iCloud Interoperability

Tuesday June 16, 2026 4:29 am PDT by
Italy's competition regulator said on Tuesday it had launched an investigation into Apple over its compliance with interoperability obligations as set out in the European Digital Markets Act (DMA). Under the DMA, Apple must ensure that third-party providers of consumer cloud services can interoperate effectively and free of charge with Apple's iOS and iPadOS software platforms. The rules...
iOS App Store General Feature Black

Apple Faces New App Store Complaint From Chinese Developers

Tuesday June 23, 2026 8:51 am PDT by
A group of 48 China-based iOS developers have filed an antitrust complaint against Apple with the country's market regulator over the App Store's commission rates, the South China Morning Post reports. The developers sent an open letter to China's State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), alleging that Apple failed to deliver on a promise to offer the lowest commission rate to the...

Top Rated Comments

cicalinarrot Avatar
8 months ago
I think most people don't even understand what's going on.
I want a disclaimer that clearly says "This App wants to sell your data to other companies and that's how you're paying to use it" when that's what's happening.
I want the choice to prevent it by default on all apps, without them even asking every time so that I could allow it by mistake.
I want the App Store to be very clear when that's happening. An app that sells my data is not "free". The button should say something as clear as "Free but they resell your data". Real freeware doesn't exist on phones and that's all Apple's fault (it's for money, not safety that they force everything through their store. We are safe on Macs and we have real freeware).
I want that for cookies on browsers too.
And I want who doesn't apply this to go to jail as scammers. But that's just my dream of accountability for companies that steal from customers.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
contacos Avatar
8 months ago
how about limiting it for everyone. Isnt this what GDPR is supposed to be for
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
wanha Avatar
8 months ago
the problem with these regulations is that the left hand doesn't know, understand, or care what the right hand is doing.

On one hand, you have legal rulings about consumer privacy and consumer rights.

On the other, there's ensuring fair competition, but... which sees privacy as a hinderance against competition.

Such siloed legal frameworks lead to conflicting, illogical, and ultimately harmful legal initiatives like is the case here.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
maszaikasza Avatar
8 months ago
Okay, I’ve read the original article on the UOKiK website, and it’s not such a big deal. It’s mainly about the terminology Apple uses
Here is a ChatGPT translation of that part of the article (so the exact texts in iOS in english can differ)

A consequence of this definition is the different messages displayed on the screens of iPhones and iPads. In the case of third-party apps, users see a prompt asking them to consent to “tracking” their activity—an action that carries a negative connotation. In contrast, for Apple’s own content the prompt concerns “personalized advertising.” Moreover, the message related to Apple differs graphically from the one shown for external entities. For example, the text on the accept/decline buttons is different. For Apple, the buttons read: “Enable personalized ads” and “Disable personalized ads,” while in the prompt for third-party apps, the order and wording of the buttons are: “Ask app not to track” and “Allow.”
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Happy_John Avatar
8 months ago

Every Tom, Dick and Harry of a European country isn’t satisfied with the (dumb) EU’s doings, they also have to add their own ill-advised and user hostile “probes”.
Way to go with insulting a whole load of nationalities in one sentence. Did you survey the roughly half a billion people in Europe to establish this "fact"?
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bollman Avatar
8 months ago
Well, if nothing else Apple has been extremely successful at making their users believe they are the second coming.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)