Apple Clings to Samsung as RAM Prices Soar - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Clings to Samsung as RAM Prices Soar

Apple is significantly increasing its reliance on Samsung for iPhone memory as component prices surge, according to The Korea Economic Daily.

iPhone Chips
Apple is said to be expanding the share of iPhone memory it sources from Samsung due to rapidly rising memory prices. The shift is expected to result in Samsung supplying roughly 60% to 70% of the low-power DRAM used in the iPhone 17, compared with a more even split with SK Hynix in previous generations, with Micron also participating as a smaller supplier.

The change is occurring against a backdrop of tightening supply in the global memory market. The iPhone relies on low-power double data rate memory (LPDDR), which is optimized for energy efficiency and thermal performance in mobile devices. While Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all manufacture LPDDR at scale, industry sources report that SK Hynix and Micron have increasingly redirected production capacity toward high-bandwidth memory (HBM), which is in high demand for artificial intelligence accelerators and data center hardware. As a result, their available capacity for mobile-focused LPDDR has become heavily constrained.

By contrast, Samsung has apparently maintained substantial production of general-purpose and mobile DRAM, allowing it to meet Apple's requirement for extremely large and predictable volumes. Samsung is said to be the only company that can meet Apple's conditions in a situation where SK Hynix seems to be focused on HBM.

According to the report, Apple's hardware is particularly sensitive to momentary voltage spikes, which are not well accommodated by its latest chips, including the A19 and A19 Pro. This places additional pressure on memory suppliers to deliver components that perform identically across very large production runs.

The price of a 12GB LPDDR5X module, the likes of which are used in the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro, has risen sharply from around $30 at the beginning of 2025 to roughly $70 today. Apple's scale and long-standing practice of negotiating multi-year supply agreements typically provide some insulation from short-term price volatility, but the magnitude of the increase has made supplier reliability and volume commitments more important. Concentrating a much larger share of orders with Samsung should allow Apple to secure more predictable deliveries and potentially benefit from economies of scale, even as overall component costs rise.

Tag: Samsung

Popular Stories

iphone duo cover glass

Apple to Pay $250 Per iPhone Duo Foldable Display in Samsung Deal

Friday September 11, 2026 3:10 am PDT by
Samsung Display has signed a three-year exclusive supply agreement with Apple to provide foldable display panels for the iPhone Duo and future models, reports Chinese leaker Instant Digital. The iPhone Duo is the first device on the market to feature Samsung's M16 OLED material set, said to bring improvements to brightness, color performance, lifespan, and power efficiency over previous OLED...
iphone duo hero

Samsung Mocks iPhone Duo

Wednesday September 9, 2026 1:28 pm PDT by
Samsung took to social media today to mock the iPhone Duo while Apple announced the device. In a series of sarcastic posts that did not explicitly mention Apple or the iPhone Duo, Samsung made comments like "Let us know when you're done reheating our leftovers" and "Was it exciting? No. Did it happen? Yes." Samsung used an #ItsTimeToSwitch hashtag in some of its posts. Launching on...
iphone duo hero

iPhone Duo is Dust-Tight With IP68 Rating, Unlike Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold8

Wednesday September 9, 2026 5:46 pm PDT by
The iPhone Duo has an IP68 dust and water resistance rating, beating Samsung and tying Google. Samsung's latest Galaxy Z Fold8 models have an IP48 dust and water resistance rating, which means they aren't able to hold up to dust as well. Google's Pixel 11 Pro Fold also has an IP68 rating. IP6X for dust means the iPhone Duo is "dust-tight" and no dust is able to get in. The IPX8 rating for ...

Top Rated Comments

AndyUnderscoreR Avatar
10 months ago
The sooner the AI bubble bursts, the better.
Score: 64 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
Modern “AI” damages everything it touches :/
Score: 45 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
10 months ago

You, uh, havent looked at RAM prices recently, huh? Triple or quadruple those price estimates. Apple’s memory upgrade prices, for like the first time ever, actually are reasonably priced
Apple's prices aren't suddenly reasonable; the entire market is unreasonable. If you need a new computer, buy it now, otherwise sit it out. Try again in a year or two; the bottom will fall out.

The entire AI market can get bent.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cateye Avatar
10 months ago

Eventually a company so vertically integrated like Apple will have to build their own fabs. Real men have fabs, like Jerry Sanders used to say. Their reliance on TSMC and Samsung is economically unsound.
Fabs are eye-wateringly expensive to build and difficult to run. The reason there are so few of them is because they only work due to economies of scale—serving the needs of many customers, not just one, and the ability to shift both customers and methods as markets require. Apple owning its own fabs would allow none of this.

Apple's entire structure as a company is based on outsourcing of manufacture. Choosing literally the most fraught and expensive possible thing to in-source is not based in any kind of economic, practical, or business reality.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
10 months ago

It’s crazy but based on what I’ve seen from Apple over the last few years every major component in their products will be manufactured by them.

We’re already seeing this with the C1/C1x and N1 chips.
They are fabed by other companies. Apple doesn’t manufacture any of their components.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
No company manages supply chain better than Apple.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)