UK to Ban Social Media for Under-16s Starting in 2027 - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

UK to Ban Social Media for Under-16s Starting in 2027

The British government will introduce a ban on social media access for all users under 16 years of age, set to take effect in 2027. UK prime minister Keir Starmer announced the plans on Monday, calling the move "the right step for Britain" and the best way to keep children safe online.

kidsoniphonedigitalwellnesspetition

"This is not something I do lightly, and I will not present it as cost-free, as if social media has [brought no] benefits to young people, because clearly that is wrong," he said. "But government is always about choices, and it's clear to me that a total ban is the right choice."

The plan goes further than a similar ban introduced in Australia. It will cover major platforms Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X. An exhaustive list has not yet been released, but Starmer said the rules will apply to services "whose purpose is to enable social interaction and which allow users to post material."

Messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal are not covered by the ban, and most social media platforms already require children to be over 13 to create an account and use their services.

Platforms will also be required to stop under-16s from livestreaming, including on gaming services, and to block functions that let strangers contact children. Those restrictions will be on by default for under-17s to avoid what the government called "a cliff-edge at 16."

Meanwhile, "romantic companion" chatbots designed to simulate sexual relationships will have to enforce a minimum age of 18, and AI chatbots in general must restrict "intimate functionalities" for under-18s.

"I am not prepared to compromise on the safety and happiness of our children, and that is why this ban must happen, and that is why this ban will happen," Starmer said. "Yes, it's hard – hard to legislate for, hard to regulate, hard to enforce. That's why we sought a wide range of views on this. That's why we listened to people, had a conversation, we looked carefully at the evidence, learned from countries like Australia that are taking similar steps."

Starmer said he plans to pass legislation before Christmas, ahead of a spring 2027 rollout. The government said on Sunday that responses to its "Growing Up in the Online World" consultation showed that 90 percent of parents supported setting a minimum age of 16 for access to the apps.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

wigmore hall

Apple Music Classical Announces New Partnership With London's Wigmore Hall

Wednesday June 3, 2026 4:59 am PDT by
Wigmore Hall Live today relaunches as a digital-only platform in partnership with Apple Music Classical, with all recording royalties passed directly to artists, Gramophone reports. Wigmore Hall is a prestigious 550-seat concert hall on Wigmore Street in London's Marylebone, widely regarded as one of the world's foremost venues for chamber music, early music, and vocal recitals. Opened in...
Apple Event Logo

Apple to Release These 15 New Products Later This Year

Friday June 12, 2026 7:45 am PDT by
Apple's annual WWDC developers conference is drawing to a close, but there is still a lot to look forward to in the second half of the year. Apple is expected to release at least 15 more products later this year. Now that the more intelligent and personal version of Siri has finally arrived in beta, a full two years after Apple first previewed it at WWDC 2024, we should begin to see some new ...
iCloud iPhone 17 Pro

iPhone Users Who Pay for iCloud Storage Get Two New Perks on iOS 27

Tuesday June 9, 2026 11:29 am PDT by
If you pay for extra iCloud storage on your iPhone, beyond the 5GB included for free, you might receive two more perks on iOS 27 at no additional cost. First, Apple said there will be daily usage limits for some of the new and enhanced Apple Intelligence features on iOS 27, including image generation. However, the company noted that "increased access" is available with "most" iCloud+ storage ...

Top Rated Comments

11 hours ago at 02:22 am

And on a Sunday morning instead of church there will be community book burning parties, with compulsory attendance.
Why invent something that isn’t happening when there are actual book bans you could point to? Is it because they aren’t happening in the UK, but in the so-called ‘land of the free’?

Social media is a pox on society, we’d be better off if it was banned for everyone.
Score: 65 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JanoschR Avatar
10 hours ago at 02:31 am
Finally. Hope this comes to Germany, too. We let these companies get away with too much for too long.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
contacos Avatar
10 hours ago at 02:34 am
This seems like a lazy shortcut that's diagnosing the wrong problem. The real issue isn't the technology itself. It's doomscrolling culture and parents who simply aren't engaged with what their kids are doing online.

For families where they don't care what their kids are doing online, this law changes nothing. Kids will just make stealth accounts (as already witnessed in Australia) or even get one created by their parents, because being the only one at school without Instagram or TikTok is social "suicide".

And what about educational content? Lock under-16s out these platforms legally, and creators will stop making content aimed at them. Why would anyone invest time in quality math tutorials, study guides or even pre-school content, when their entire target audience is banned from watching? You're not protecting kids from bad content. You're cutting them off from the good stuff too.

This policy ends up punishing the kids who actually use social media to learn, while doing nothing to fix the underlying problems: checked-out parents and algorithms designed to maximise screen time at any cost.

This almost equals burning books cuz some books were "BAD" in the 30s.

These are the findings from the report done for the German government regarding this topic:

1. Bans Don't Teach Digital Competence
Experts argue that blanket media bans simply lock children out of the environments they need to navigate. The consensus is that digital safety and resilience can only be learned through active, guided use, not by putting up digital walls.

2. Pushing Kids into Darker Corners
Critics in Germany warn that a ban will not stop children from wanting to connect. It will simply force them to create stealth accounts, bypass restrictions, and enter less-regulated, unmoderated, or darker spaces on the internet where parental visibility and platform safety controls are entirely nonexistent.

3. The Problem is the Platform Design, Not the Age
German experts and organizations (like the Workers' Welfare Association - AWO) argue that age limits are too simplistic and miss the actual root of the problem. They advocate for holding tech companies legally accountable under the EU’s Digital Services Act to force a restructuring of the platforms themselves.
The focus should be on:

* Disabling manipulative, addictive algorithms.
* Ending infinite scrolling and autoplay features for minors.
* Stopping intrusive push notifications that drive screen addiction.

4. Loss of Education and Participation

A common argument raised by Germany's National Student Conference and media researchers is that a total ban strips young people of positive spaces. It removes access to peer support groups, vital educational content, and the ability to participate in broader societal and political debates.
In short, Germany's experts are leaning toward a "protection and education" model over a prohibition model

Edit: second half is translated from a German article, which summarized the key findings btw
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
northernmunky Avatar
10 hours ago at 02:57 am
With the algorithms the way they are now, my own social media is serving me up a lot of crazy nonsense, so much so that I'm now actively removing myself from it all its that bad. I dread to think what children are being served up. I hate to say it but I think this is a positive thing.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Diopter Avatar
11 hours ago at 02:23 am
I don’t really like anything that requires age verification, but also Facebook and similar will do anything to obsessively hook people (not just kids) and melt their brains with algorithmic slop, so… not great either way.

We do ban kids from smoking for the sake of their health, though.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
TracerAnalog Avatar
10 hours ago at 02:47 am

Why invent something that isn’t happening when there are actual book bans you could point to? Is it because they aren’t happening in the UK, but in the so-called ‘land of the free’?

Social media is a pox on society, we’d be better off if it was banned for everyone.
Hear, hear! We as humans have not evolved to deal with the negative effects of social media. It is unfortunate, because social media does have many positive effects. Unfortunately we do not stand a chance against manipulations by the algorithms and later true AI. Good actor, bad actors, there is no way to know who manipulates us to what end...

I believe this type of ban is a just first step against guarding us from these 'Golems' run by AI systems.

And yes, I'm all about personal freedom, but I think people are very naive when it comes to the dangers of AI and social media.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)