Telegram CEO Says Extortionist Manipulated Apple Into App Store Removal - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Telegram CEO Says Extortionist Manipulated Apple Into App Store Removal

Telegram was subject to a "takedown extortionist" who planted AI-modified child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to get Apple to remove the app from the App Store, Telegram CEO Pavel Durov said today. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store for about 40 minutes on Monday night after discovering CSAM, but reinstated the app after Telegram removed the content.

telegram app icon

The attacker was a takedown extortionist: someone who demands ransom from group owners in exchange for not targeting their communities. These extortionists use automated accounts to plant illegal content in public groups and then report it directly to Apple, attempting to trigger the removal of legitimate communities whose owners refused to pay them.

Durov said the attacker used a "technical trick" to evade moderation tools, editing an old message in an active group chat to add illegal content. The attacker was able to bypass moderation because group members didn't see the message to report it. Durov said illegal pornographic content in public groups is not a systemic problem because Telegram has effective moderation, and this was an edge case where an attacker used "backdated, effectively invisible content."

Apple pulled Telegram from the ‌App Store‌ before contacting the company, according to Durov. He said Apple was manipulated into overreacting, and he warned of a "potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content."

After removing Telegram from the ‌App Store‌, Apple said a content review found child sexual abuse material that violated the ‌App Store‌ guidelines. Apple further said Telegram "promptly removed the content and banned the user," leading to the app's return to the ‌App Store‌. Apple has not commented on Durov's extortionist claim.

Popular Stories

intel macs no more updates

Mac App Store Apps Can Now Drop Support for Intel Macs

Tuesday September 1, 2026 4:50 pm PDT by
Apple today informed developers that universal Mac App Store apps that require macOS 13 or later can remove support for Intel-based Mac computers. We're reaching out to let you know that universal macOS apps on the Mac App Store that require macOS 13 or later can now remove support for Intel-based Mac computers. By removing support for Intel-based Mac computers, you can simplify your...
MapQuest Logo 2026

MapQuest Tops App Store Charts After Refusing 'Lake America' Change

Monday August 31, 2026 7:49 am PDT by
MapQuest is in the spotlight this week after refusing to change "Lake Ontario" to "Lake America" on its map following an executive order issued by U.S. President Donald Trump last week. As of Monday morning, the MapQuest app is the top free iPhone app on Apple's App Store charts in Canada and fourth on the equivalent U.S. chart. For our younger readers, MapQuest was once a popular service...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Plans to Squeeze More Revenue From the App Store, Report Says

Monday September 7, 2026 3:19 am PDT by
Apple is looking at further ways to monetize the App Store and increase the company's recurring revenue from the platform, according to a new report. Writing in his latest Power On newsletter, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said that newly appointed Apple CEO John Ternus and services chief Eddy Cue are behind the effort to raise margins from the App Store, which already generates Apple an estimated ...

Top Rated Comments

sw1tcher Avatar
6 weeks ago

Regardless of the reason the content was there, Apple's process doesn't seem like an overreaction.
Maybe not on its own, but compare Apple's actions with Telegram (pulled app) and Apple's lack of action with both X and Grok (did not pull apps)


https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/15/apple-threatened-pull-grok-from-app-store/


Internally, the company had found both X and Grok in violation of its App Store guidelines and demanded its developers submit a content moderation plan, the letter reveals.

According to the letter, Apple rejected an initial fix from xAI as insufficient, saying the "changes didn't go far enough," and Apple warned it that additional alterations were required or Grok would be removed. After further back-and-forth, however, Apple eventually concluded that a later submission of the app had improved enough for it to be approved.
Apple treats you differently when you're not the worlds richest person.
Score: 30 Votes (Like | Disagree)
KENESS Avatar
6 weeks ago
Regardless of the reason the content was there, Apple's process doesn't seem like an overreaction. It was unavailable for download for 40 minutes. Nobody's usage of the app already on their device was interrupted. The issue was dealt with and it was restored.

Seriously, WHERE is this overreaction they speak of?
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
User 6502 Avatar
6 weeks ago

Regardless of the reason the content was there, Apple's process doesn't seem like an overreaction. It was unavailable for download for 40 minutes. Nobody's usage of the app already on their device was interrupted. The issue was dealt with and it was restored.

Seriously, WHERE is this overreaction they speak of?
Remove an app used by millions IS an overreaction. This could easily have happened with any other app with user generated content. The files in questions were not bundled with the app, they were added by users. Is Apple going to remove itself from the AppStore because Safari can browse to websites with illegal content?
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
6 weeks ago
And yet both Grok and X are still available when they both continue to contain a plethora of AI generated CSAM.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
6 weeks ago
Something about this seems a bit off, even if I take Durov's comments as accurate and at face value.

What he's saying is that a user account in an existing chat was able to edit old messages to insert CSAM and completely bypass moderation. His claim is that such content was "effectively invisible", which for a normal chat user (and the caveat that I don't use Telegram so don't know the nuances of its UI) seems plausible.

But: Isn't putting CSAM in places that bypass moderation and are effectively invisible to people who don't know to look there exactly what actual purveyors of child exploitation material want to do?

If this loophole exists, and the only "fix" was to delete the content and ban the user, why wouldn't it work for some genuine CSAM-sharers to join an "I love pizza" chat (or whatever innocuous substitute word they use these days), talk normal things, wait a while, then go back and edit old messages to share CSAM with each other except not report it to Apple? If that bypasses moderation and is effectively invisible to anyone other than the people abusing the platform to do illegal things (who know where to look), how exactly is this not an ongoing and real loophole in their moderation policies?

Heck, for all we know, this is being used all over the place on Telegram for real CSAM sharing and nobody is reporting it to Apple in the real cases.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
dannys1 Avatar
6 weeks ago
Interesting how they said "the user was banned"

So they did this with one account?

What happens when someone plans this properly - with thousands of accounts all controlled by AI agents - posting messages in various groups for months and then unleashes the attack - it's no longer one account to block, you've got potentially hundreds, if not thousands all queued up - the worst spam attack known to man...
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)